By Tony Attwood
The European Commission has recommended reform of the football transfer system. And what the EC wants the EC usually gets (as with for example the Bosman ruling).
The new plan involves limiting what the EC sees as “inflated” transfer fees and a levy (interestingly being call a “fair play” levy) on fees rising above a set level.
The argument is that the EC has allowed football to be an exception from various standard EU regulations on competition so long as it is possible for clubs to move up and down the leagues through promotion and relegation.
Naturally anything that affects income and expenditure could also have an impact on ticket prices. We all know that Arsenal tickets are hard to come by and have been said (wrongly) by some to be the most expensive in the Premier League. This could affect us all.
The EC now suggests that the cost of salaries and transfers of top players players means that in effect there is a closed league at the top level with the same clubs always occupying the top slots. Only 2% of transfer fees actually reaches the smaller clubs, according the to EC review.
And – and this is the bit that is of particular interest – there is a concern about criminal activity. If you have seen the occasional forays into corruption in football written by myself and colleagues on Untold you will know that we see match fixing by gamblers as only one part of the corruption problem. One of the other major areas is the way football clubs and transfers can be used as a front for money laundering. And what do you know… The EC is getting rather exercised about “criminality in the transfer market”.
As a result the EC is now putting forward a series of proposed changes for the transfer market including…
1: Transfer fees on players who extend their contract limited to “70% of the gross salary owed to the player for the entire period of his contract”
2: The regulation of buy-out clauses “to prevent abusive practices”.
3: A “fair play levy” on transfer fees over a fixed minimum, with this money being given to the poorer clubs.
4: An official channel which records the movement of players so that everyone can see exactly where the money is going, and ensure that everything happens according to the rule book.
5: A campaign to ensure that players and clubs are aware of their rights and duties.
6: A EU wide limit on the maximum number of players per club.
7: Regulation of the loan transfer system across the EU (it is virtually unregulated at the moment)
8: Officially ending third-party ownership in all EU countries.
9: Financial Fair Play to be introduced and supported.
The report says that since 1995 (when Bosman came in) the annual transfer spend by clubs has increased from €403m to €3bn in 2010-11 with the number of transfers going up 300%. The vast majority of this spending comes from a very tiny number of clubs.
In drawing up its proposals the EC has consulted with Fifa, Uefa and the European Club Association.
This does not mean the EC will radically change the system of transfers. Instead Androulla Vassiliou the Commissioner responsible said, “The European Commission fully recognises the right of sports authorities to set rules for transfers, but our study shows that the rules as they are do not ensure a fair balance in football or anything approaching a level playing field in league or cup competitions. We need a transfer system which contributes to the development of all clubs and young players.”
Kea, the Brussels-based consultancy involved in the study said, “Seventeen years after the Bosman ruling and 11 years after the informal agreement between Fifa, Uefa and the European Commission on the transfers of players, the document reveals that sporting regulation in relation to transfers has contributed to the increase of free movement of professional players without, however, managing to curb the amount of certain transfer fees.
“The study proposes measures to encourage transfer rules that contribute to more balanced and fair competition. While redistribution of transfer expenditures to clubs training players constitutes one of the justifications for the transfer rules, redistributive impacts linked to the transfer market remain limited. Indeed training compensation and solidarity mechanisms only account for 1.84% of the total agreed transfer fees within Europe.”
The Kea report highlighted key issues that the study showed were major problems.
1: Huge debts that threatens the financial stability of numerous clubs.
2: The criminality which Untold has been publicising. It added to our list of corruption, money laundering and illegal activities relating to gambling, also introducing the trafficking of players and abusive terms of employment.
3: Forms of investment in players, including third party ownership, which take power away from clubs and the regulatory authorities.
4: The inability of organisations like the FA to organise and regulate football in the face of the larger clubs, which are run like businesses and have an obligation to deliver financial results to their shareholders.
The cases of Leeds United’s and Portsmouth’s collapse, the money laundering problems that are still surrounding Birmingham, and the huge amounts of money pouring into Chelsea, Manchester City, and PSG, are all cause for concern.
The report also says that, “The turnover of the first division championships of the 53 Uefa member countries increased from €9bn in 2006 to €12.7bn in 2010. But overall net losses increased steadily over the period 2006-2010 to reach €1.64bn in 2010. 56% of the clubs concerned are reporting net losses for the year 2010….
“In general the transfer market suffers from a lack of transparency in transactions [which] is encouraging a competitive imbalance. Therefore, the transfer matching system from Fifa and financial fair play from Uefa constitute very key developments whose implementation should be encouraged. They show the willingness of sporting bodies to tackle in a serious manner abuses related to some extent to the transfer market.”
The EU Expert Group on “Good Governance in Sport” will take up the issue in April. This is the same group that is already discussing match-fixing. The report is expected to go to EU sport ministers before the end of the year, and changes should be announced in 2014, for implementation thereafter.
So what will all this mean for football fans? Greater competition yes, and quite possibly a decline or at least stabilisation of ticket prices once the EC gets its hands on the issue of competition.
- Woolwich Arsenal: The club that changed football – Arsenal’s early years
- Making the Arsenal – how the modern Arsenal was born in 1910
- The Crowd at Woolwich Arsenal FC: crowd behaviour at the early matches
- Referee Decisions – just what are the refs up to this season?
- Parent News – what is going on in schools these days?
- The Arsenal History Blog from the AISA Arsenal History Society