13 responses

  1. Barndoor Bendtner
    28/03/2013

    Thanks for another good article….apart from one phrase I disagree with. At the beginning you say the ‘robust’ tackles must be eliminated. I dont think that is right.
    You correctly and clearly explain the laws as they stand, and the interpretation as it should be, but surely the aim must be to allow robust challenges, while eliminating dangerous tackles.
    At the risk of being a pedant, you can be robust without being dangerous.

  2. Malaysian gunner
    28/03/2013

    It’s about time the football authorities get tough with the thugs and their conniving clubs. The std 3 game ban aint enough to serve as a deterrent.The thug shd be banned for as long as the injured player is out of action or a minimum of ten games with five points docked for the offending club.
    During ww2 and Malaya was occupied by the Japs criminals were beheaded and their head diplayed in public.As a result the crime rate was low or non existent.
    It’s time the FA have a relook at their statutes and update the punishment. Football has changed and the rewards are staggering.Skill shd hold sway over brute force and if the the latter uses it to intimidate or injure,the ref shd send the thug off.
    Btw,linesman and refs who overlook such
    injury threatening tackles shd not be allowed to ref matches.

  3. WalterBroeckx
    28/03/2013

    I tried to improve the outlook of the page a bit. Was my initial fault. Sorry

  4. bilzo
    28/03/2013

    Whatever, I love big tackles in games, not horrific two footed or dangerous tackles. But i hate watching a game of football when the ref is blowing up for every tackle breaking up the game like they do in Spain and sometimes the champions league. The tackle is dying from football yet it is one of the most fantastic aspects of today’s game and it has been for a long time. A dangerous tackle is a dangerous tackle and there is a line. But punishing good hard tackles will just ruin our game, take away the fluency and simply illegalize one of the most traditional and exciting aspects of the English game.

  5. bilzo
    28/03/2013

    Someone like thomas vermaelen for example bases his game on a good hard challenge

  6. Gf60
    28/03/2013

    Even when I was a kid back in the mid 50’s, the two footed tackle raised screams of protest. In the 60s and 70s Revie and his back breakers with Norm Hunter prominent at Leeds, Chopper Harris at Chelsea and even our own beloved Peter Story weren’t the stuff of dreams for timid forwards.

    BUT is it just my looking at my youth with the rose tints on or were there far, far less injuries suffered then compared with now?

  7. STEVE VALLINS
    28/03/2013

    Gf60
    In the 60s ,70s , 80s and the very early 90s most teams had there hard men then rules changed no tackling from behind also the game slowly over the next 2o years got faster and faster ( lighter boots and balls ) . S0 IMO speed has caused a good percentary of injuries to players in recent times

  8. Adam
    28/03/2013

    Good read, thankyou.

  9. Domhuail
    29/03/2013

    Steve V…….while the game has become more rapid and faster paced,it couldn’t be speed alone that is at fault for injuries sustained for the following reasons:

    1) ALL players have become faster, so defenders have no problem keeping up with their opponents. However the art of firm but safe tackling seems to have declined.

    2)Most teams still have their hard men but regardless, tackling from behind was never really permitted as it, by its very nature, entailed a blind tackle and often a desperate one.

    3)A good tackle is defined as either a shoulder to shoulder charge which neither injures or risks the opponent’s getting injured. It is also defined as a fair and firm challenge for the ball between two players or more, without the risk or presence of dangerous or serious foul play.

    4)There are thousands of fair and firm tackles every day in Football where nobody gets injured. Why would dangerous or serious foul play represent anything desirable in the Game?

    There is a vast chasm between a good hard tackle and dangerous or serious foul play and any yearning for the latter is nefarious and misplaced in any Football context.

  10. STEVE VALLINS
    29/03/2013

    Hi Domhuail just got up the tacckle can be fair but if impact occures its the speed of collisionand how you come out of the tackle.It could be a fair tackle but the speed you were travelling at propels you into the advertising hoarding

  11. ARSENAL 13
    30/03/2013

    Nicely written @Mal.

    Hope you come up with more….and enlighten us in the process.

  12. ARSENAL 13
    30/03/2013

    Also, I am surprised at the silence on RYOs injury by Mirallas.

  13. Domhuail
    30/03/2013

    Steve….Do you mean tackle, or occurs or boarding? I had trouble understanding your post. Yes, at high speed a good tackle can send a player flying but the referees know how to handle that and if, in their opinion, there was dangerous play or serious foul play, then they’re supposed to call it. Football is a physical game, but it should NEVER be dangerous or foul.

Back to top
mobile desktop