By Tony Attwood
Well, there it is. I pop over (or rather under, since I went by train) the English Channel for a few days, practice following the football news in French, watch France and Spain on TV being given the run around in warm ups, muck about a lot a Futuraworld (Poitiers) and then come back to find…
Revenue and Customs (what is commonly know as “the tax man”) is taking the whole Premier League to court over the illegality of its tax regime.
The story turned up in my absence in Accountancy Age, and would you believe it, the Sun, Star and Mirror didn’t actually catch up with it at all.
But they should have done because then would would have had “Sexy Suzie, our page three girl of the day says, ‘I think the tax man has got this one wrong and should dunk his head in a pile of horse droppings so there’,” because this one runs alongside such jolly changes to the world of football as
a) Uefa’s end of Financial Doping (which I was raving about before I was put on the train by worried colleagues)
b) The fact that a whole bunch of clubs are teetering on the brink – and Rhys I noted your comment and will look into the Cardiff situation further, but as far as I can see Revenue and Customs still have a winding up order out for them)
c) Liverpool do not, as I understand Redknapp the Younger is reputed to have said while I was not looking, “have £30m to spend and want to make sure they have the right manager in place to spend it”. Rather they have a club over which the vultures have gathered.
Here’s the run down….
If a club enters administration they are bound by the football creditors rule, which means “football creditors” like other clubs to whom they owe transfer money, along with players and managers, get paid in full first of all. Anything left over is divided between the unsecured creditors including HMRC.
The tax office has long called the rule “unlawful”, saying, “HMRC‘s view is that there is nothing in insolvency legislation that provides for unsecured debts due to “football creditors” to be paid in preference to other unsecured creditors such as HMRC.
“Our view is that the practical application of the so called ‘Football Creditors Rule’ may be unlawful. We have nothing further to add at this stage.”
In the case of Portsmouth FC football creditors are expected to receive a full repayment of £22.4m funded by the EPLs deductions in the club’s allocated TV revenue. Unsecured creditors (ranging from St Johns Ambulance to you and me (if you and me are citizens of the United Kingdom) in the shape of Revenue and Customs (who are owed an estimated £83m) may be £16.5m spread over five years.
Combine the Uefa Financial Doping rules, the “no transfer” rule noted above, the 25 player rule, and the abolition of the football creditor rule, and you have an absolute shift in the financial position of the EPL just at a moment when the majority of clubs are least able to cope.
Funny old game.
- What every football club (and most certainly Arsenal) is aiming for.
- The apparent decline of Tottenham and the question of care for players elsewhere
- Positive injury news for Arsenal ahead Monday’s game with Sheffield United
- Arsenal’s finances stay secure but we can expect more price rises for fans
- How a 14th monk described Arsenal’s failure to buy Moisés Caicedo and Mykhailo Mudryk