So are Arsenal the dirtiest team in the league this season? The figures suggest not.

By Tony Attwood

So which club is the dirtiest in the Premier League this season?

Read the media or listen to fans of opponents and the answer is clear: it is Arsenal.  And yet when it comes to the number of fouls committed so far, Arsenal are 18th in the chart.  Only two clubs commit fewer.   And remember this is across the opening ten games this season – not just a game or two.   Just on a quarter of the season has been played, and only Chelsea and Everton have committed fewer fouls.

So if the argument is that Arsenal are treated differently from other clubs, that means that refs have been persuaded to go tough on 17 other teams.  That is a huge amount of corruption. 

Because that seems unlikely I am sticking to fouls penalised by the referee or yellow cards waved by the referee as being signs of rule breaking.   And because that is a point of debate we are listing both in the charts below.

In terms of the club that has committed the most fouls, according to the referees, that is Liverpool.   Curiously I don’t think that is often pointed out by the media – which maybe shows that the media love-in with Liverpool continues, even though the refs have caught up with their tactical approach.

The most yellow cards have gone to Hull City, who I think are still playing as if they are in the second division; the least to Arsenal.

The most fouls committed on average before a card is waved goes to Coventry with 9.81 fouls on average before a card is shown.   The least fouls per card is Hull City with 3.80.  In other words Coventry can commit over two and a half times as many fouls as Hull before they have a card waved at one of their men – which even allowing for the fact that cards can be waved for things other than fouls, seems ludicrously high.

 

CLub Fouls Yellow cards Fouls per card Fouls per card position
Liverpool 146 25 5.84 8th
Notttm Forest 140 24 5.83 9th
Bournemouth 140 27 5.19 16th
Tottenham 135 16 8.44 2nd
Leeds 129 19 6.79 5th
Brentford 125 22 5.68 11th
Bright 123 24 5.12 15th
Newcastlle 121 26 4.65 19th
Man Un 118 21 5.62 12th
Sunderland 116 18 6.44 6th
Hull City 114 30 3.80 20th
Aston Villa 112 20 5.6 13th
Ipswich 109 19 5.74 10th
Man City 108 13 8.31 3rd
Coventruy 108 11 9.81 1st
Fulahm 105 19 5.53 14th
Crystal P 102 15 6.00 7th
Arsenal 98 14 7.00 4th
Chelsea 95 20 4.75 17th
Everton 84 18 4.67 18th

These figures only apply to this season and show Liverpool as making half as many fouls again as Arsenal.

There is a rough correlation between the number of yellow cards and the number of fouls called by  the referee for each club, as can be seen in the fourth column (“fouls per card”) but it is far from exact, as noted above.

Coventry can commit 9.81 fouls before a card is waved, while Hull can commit only 3.8.  Now in part this can be due to referees awarding yellow cards for repeated fouling, but even so the difference between the number of fouls Coventry get away with before a card, as opposed to and Hull City, is extraordinary.  One might say beyond belief.  If I were Hull’s manager I’d be lording a complaint.

Of course we have to recognise that yellow cards can be given for other activities beyond fouls such as protesting, delaying the taking of a free kick, and so forth, and there is no data to allow for this, but my observation of games is that these “other” reasons are modest when compared with cards for fouls, so the figures remain of interest.

Certainly it is interesting that Liverpool have committed 74% more fouls so far this season than Everton – one wonders if the clubs know that each other is behaving in such a different manner.  But it remains the issue of the number of fouls per card that different clubs get that looks concerning.

It would appear that referees are giving out cards not just for fouls but for the cumulative effect of fouls, and I am not at all sure that this is how the rules of football are written.   A tackle or an elbow etc is either a foul or not, but it seems that referes are indeed giving out cards for repeated foul play.

And so what of Arsenal?   

Arsenal committed the third smallest number of fouls per game in the opening ten games of the season and got the third smallest number of yellow cards.  Top of the league for fouls was Liverpool but top of the league for yellow cards was Hull – and my perception is that Hull might well consider taking this fact to the PGMO, and making the point public.

Coventry and Tottenham are committing the most fouls before a yellow card is waved, and it is interesting that Tottenham are getting away with twice as many fouls before a card is waved as some other clubs!

Are Tottenham’s fouls really so inoccuous that the referees don’t want to penalise?   Or is it that the hospitality faciltieis in the referee’s chabnging areas are so nice in the new stadium that the referees don’t like to penalise their hosts?   (Or could they just feel sorry for Tottenham, having spent all that money on a ground, but have come 17th for each of the last two seasons?)

Certainly Coventry can hardly complain about refereeing this season – they can commit 9.81 fols before they get a card waved, while the aforementioned Hull can only get away with 3.80.  That doesn’t seem right.

I wonder why the referees have got it in for Hull this season?  Are their referee changing rooms damp or crowded?  Is the coffee cold?  I think we should be told.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *