Why Arsenal are doing so well, and Tottenham are doing so badly.

 

 

By Tony Attwood

Last season, Arsenal had the second-best away form in the league, gaining just three points fewer than Liverpool away from home… with just two defeats in the whole campaign.   

And now we might compare that previous campaign with where we have got to so far in this season. Arsenal got 35 points last season away from home, and looking at the table below, we can see we are already on 32 away points with three away games to go.   The defence away from home is looking better too, but the number of goals scored is down by nine.  But we seem to be quite able to win games without scoring many goals, and in the end, it is the points that count.

But whatever happens with the scoring, the chance of Arsenal outdoing last season’s away form remains a possibility – and that is rather pleasing given just how far we are above the away form of Chelsea.

2025/26 away form.

 

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
1 Arsenal 16 9 5 2 26 13 13 32
2 Chelsea 16 7 4 5 30 21 9 25
3 Manchester City 15 7 4 4 24 17 7 25
4 Everton 15 7 3 5 16 16 0 24

 

Now, all this seems quite reasonable.   But mention of Chelsea takes me on to a different point, and one that I find rather interesting.  Chelsea are second in the league in terms of away form, although quite a distance away from Arsenal.   Which leads me to wonder about the difference between home and away form for various clubs.   For there are a couple of clubs whose form is the reverse of what we would normally expect.   And you may have guessed I am going to start with Tottenham.

 

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
9 Tottenham Hotspur away 15 5 5 5 22 22 0 20
 20 Tottenham Hotspur home 16 2 4 10 18 28 -10 10

 

This really is rather extraordinary – to have HALF the number of points at home compared with points away from home – and that after playing one more home game than away game this season!   Chelsea are not that bad, but they too are doing BETTER away from home than at home…

 

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
2 Chelsea away 16 7 4 5 30 21 9 25
12 Chelsea home 15 6 5 4 23 17 6 23

Chelsea away are not gaining that many more points than Chelsea at home but even so the fact is that they are getting a slightly better points total away, and they are scoring more goals away from home.  And I wonder why that is.

For this, of course, is rather unusual – for the fact is that there are, for most teams, more home wins in a season than there are away wins.  There are many reasons for this – the lack of travel disruptions, the home club’s familiarity with the changing rooms and the ground, the volume of the home support, and so on.

So what might turn this normal benefit to the home team upside down, and give the away team an extra advantage?  (And of course, I do know that in Chelsea’s case, there is no real difference between home and away, but even that is very unusual.  But they are not doing as well at home as we might expect, so I think they are worth considering here.)  

I think the answer is pretty obvious – the home support have in each case have turned on their club owners, and perhaps even to some degree on their team.   Instead of supporting their team, the home support is more interested in telling the board what they think of them – and to some degree what they think of the team as well.

So it is a viable notion to suggest that the decline in Tottenham’s performance this season and the growing chance that they might actually get relegated is down to the decline in their home form, which in turn is caused in part at least, by the way the fans are reacting to their team.

Of course, being an Arsenal supporter, I am quite happy to see this happen, and I feel safe making this suggestion here because I doubt any Tottenham fans, and certainly none of the Totty hierarchy read my words of wisdom.

But this does raise an important point for Arsenal, and indeed for all clubs.   The clubs need the home support, and if they lose that, slippage down the table can happen.  The media (especially with Arsenal) are always keen to point out what is going wrong, and we are the only ones who can stand up against the press.

Yet I would also say it is quite reasonable for home supporters to expect something back in return.   We demand quality transfers to bring in new players, and for all players to give 100% in every game.   After all, they are paid infinitely more than we are.   They are indeed paid to be there, while we have to pay for the privilege of getting into the ground.

Now I have no absolute proof that Tottenham’s decline in home form is down to the treatment they get from their own fans – and indeed I would say the prime blame lies with the owners of Tottenham H, with their ceaseless policy of changing managers every month, that has caused their demise.   But we do have an impact, in terms of what happens at the game, and maybe even a little bit in terms of what is written in blogs.

So yes, I am quite happy with the response of Tottenham supporters to the current situation – although really you should find some way to get at the owners rather than the players.

 

3 Replies to “Why Arsenal are doing so well, and Tottenham are doing so badly.”

  1. OT

    Was it just me or were the BBC commentators at the women’s game last night blatantly pro-Chelsea? Bigging up everything Chelsea did despite the fact that Arsenal are the reigning European Champions. Making injury excuses for them despite us being without key players. As for the James goal, which was very good, the commentators were clearly in ecstasy but “best goal I’ve ever seen”, I dispute that.

    As for Chelsea’s disallowed goals, the first could be considered harsh but we see them not given. The second one they initially attempted to argue it was good but to anyone watching it was a clear foul. In fact, my initial reaction was that it was dangerous and a potential red card. the Chelsea player hit Borbe straight in the stomach studs up. Yet not a word from the commentators about the recklessness of the Chelsea player.

    It appears that the anti-Arsenal rhetoric has now permeated the women’s game too and the media fully have laid their stall out in respect Arsenal Football Club.

    By sheer coincidence, compare this with Liverpool. I lost count of the number of articles on the BBC website last night idolising Mo Salah. Great player, and a sad end to his Liverpool career but the BBC must have called every scribbler in on overtime yesterday evening and ordered all of them to write at least a couple of stories each.

    As I said, a sad end but any criticism of Liverpool was conspicuous by it’s absence.

  2. Mikey
    Absolutely agree.
    I found the pair of them so annoying I had to turn the sound off after tolerating them for most of the first half.
    It was not just their obvious bias but they just wouldn’t shut up and take a breath, when they weren’t bigging up Chelsea they were talking about stuff irrelevant to the progress of the game. It was like trying to watch a film and having someone sitting behind you talking all the time.

  3. Its easy to ‘look down’ on the ever sinking Tots. Easy that is if you became an Arsenal supporter after 1970 when Arsenal won their first trophy snce 1953. The period in the club’s history now known as the ‘Long sleep’.

    Tots were winners of trophies, while we were busy rolling over managers and good coaches.
    It was hard being an Arsenal supporter back then where I lived.

    Laugh at the fate of Tots by all means but for ……..? Arsenal fans could be wearing the failed boots that Tots fan wear,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *