Why do people keep making up transfer stories when 97% of them are wrong

 

By Tony Attwood

Many football journalists and bloggers whose prime area of writing is transfer rumours – have something rather nasty in common.   For it seems that most of them are narcissists – according to new research.

Narcissists are people with a grandiose sense of self-importance,along with a lack of empathy for others, a desperate need for administration, and a belief that ones talents should be acknowledged by others.

In short, it is the personality of many newspaper football writers, broadcasters and bloggers.

The world of the transfer pundits is a world in which the writers believe that somehow they have superior information that ought to be noted, and they in particular know what is going on.  

The essence of the articles these people write, is generally “I know something special that is happening behind the scenes.”  Of course the “something special” never happens, but this doesn’t matter because by tomorrow the pundit knows something else and is now writing about that.  

We can even put a percentage on the level of narcissistic commentary in football for across the last four summers we have not only recorded the transfer rumours that are spread by the media and bloggers, but the level of success they have in noting transfers that actually happen.

That success rate has in the last two seasons reached the dizzy height of 3% – which is to say that three out of every hundred stories reported turn out to be true.   Prior to that the failure rate was 98%.

And yet amazingly in the face of a 97 or 98% failure rate, the rumours continue to be reported day after day often with the implication that the failure to make the transfer was entirely the club’s fault.  The player was there for the taking, but Arsenal (in our case but other clubs get the same treatment) were just too slow or too miserly, or too inward-looking, or just too damn stupid, to make it happen.

The question of why the narcissists who run transfer tales continue to write them in the face of such a massive error rate is easily answered: being a pundit makes them feel good.  The question of why so many transfers don’t happen is also clear: for the most part, they are total fabrications, and Arsenal (or whichever club is involved) never were looking to buy that player in the first place.

But tucked behind this awful charade of media fantasies is something rather reassuring: for recent research shows that the narcissists who create the tales and write them up, are themselves suffering more than we suffer if we ever start reading their nonsense.

For it seems that most of these fantasy transfer reporters are themselves longing to be recognised as serious writers.  Indeed according to some of the most recent research  (this from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology), they feel themselves on the outside, desperately trying to be on the inside – hence the stories they make up and copy from each other, day after day.

In the recent research, the researchers questioned 1,592 people who had through their own answers to questionnaires, shown traits of narcissism including a desire to be seen as important and a need to be admired and recognised.  However their personalities actually tended to make them more likely to be ostracised by their peers, largely it seems because they are pretty intolerable to be with.

In short, for hese people are often (and of course, this is not the case for everyone but is often the case) writing and indeed creating transfer rumours does one thing: it satisfies their own desire to be seen as important.

The research also shows that these people often perceive themselves to have been ignored or excluded.  They are in short “reporting” the rumours (which as our research across the years has shown are 97% useless in terms of predicting a transfer that actually happens) to make themselves feel good, because they feel shunned – generally because of their narcissism.

This is because, by and large, most of us find narcissistic people rather unappealing and not the sort of people we want as friends.

This in turn leads to ever high levels of ostracism which makes the individual more narcissistic.  In terms of football writing, in fact, the more the individual’s wild tales about Arsenal signing this or that player are discovered to be completely untrue, the more the narcissistic person feels excluded and so the more narcissistic they become.

thus in terms of writing about football, the more their football transfer stories fail to predict real events, the more football transfer stories they invent.  The more they are ostracised, the more narcissistic they become.

The full research paper is Büttner, C. M., Rudert, S. C., Albath, E. A., Sibley, C. G., & Greifeneder, R. (2025). Narcissists’ experience of ostracism is published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

2 Replies to “Why do people keep making up transfer stories when 97% of them are wrong”

  1. “The player was there for the taking, but Arsenal (in our case but other clubs get the same treatment)”

    I don’t doubt for one moment they do, but I honestly believe in our case it is worse than most, and often far more malevolent. And as well as using transfer rumours as a stick with which to beat a club, when it suits they are also used as a means to boost or reinforce a clubs standing. I have written about this before, but it’s still the best example I ever heard. It was a while ago because it was on Talkshite, back in the days when Man Utd still had some semblance of a football team, and were at the very peak of the medias love-in and Wenger hatred. Basically it went like this.

    In Arsenals case:

    They would talk up a ‘rumour’ about player X being on Arsenals ‘radar’, and more importantly how desperate we are to sign this particular player. Of course, the tone was always mocking. Why would this player want to go to Arsenal? But still, they could ‘get it done ‘if only they would stop messing about.

    But of course the rumour was clearly made it. The player was never on our radar. He was never even for sale.

    -But it made for a week of Arsenal bashing for looking at a player they couldn’t get if they wanted to.

    -Followed by a week of Arsenal bashing for failing to get a player they could of got if only they hadn’t messed about.

    In Manchester United’s case:

    Every week there was new superstar that Man Utd were looking to buy. That’s what they do. They are such a big club. But perhaps more importantly we were constantly being told how desperate this player was to ‘secure a move’ to the magnificent Manchester United.

    But again of course the rumour was clearly made it. The player was never on their radar. He was never even for sale. It was never going to happen.

    -But it made for a week of fawning over Manchester United for having the ‘ambition’ to even look at such a fantastic World Class player

    -Followed by a week of talking about how close Manchester United came so getting such an ‘audacious deal’ over the line. Alas it wasn’t to be, but wow, just wow!!

    They can, and do use these made up transfers both ways, depending on the club.

Leave a Reply