By Tony Attwood
So the story continues: the Arsenal budget is £40m or £45m. Maybe it is. Or maybe it is a ploy by Arsenal to try and get prices reduced or maybe the £40m might just be an invention by journalists desperate for a story – any story – to knock Arsenal. Who can tell when the source of this information is a bunch of journalists who happily submit stories each story which endlessly add to the list of players who Arsenal are about to buy? (Almost 80 so far this summer). Certainly whatever their sources, they are neither rational nor reliable, since they have done the same each summer for at least the past four years.
And what will they do as and when Arsenal do exceed £40m or £45m? They will run the story that Arsenal were panicked into action after a backlash from their own supporters.
So the Telegraph says, “It already feels like Arsenal are on the back foot, desperately trying to regain their composure, and we are not yet halfway through July.” But that is just how they want their readers to feel. It actually feels to me like Arsenal once more have a strong man in control, a guy who ain’t going to take any rubbish from players who have read newspaper reports and mistakenly taken them for the truth, rather than a load of invented tosh; the ravings of a bunch of increasingly desperate bunch of men who have no idea what is going on, but who are contracted to write something negative.
Indeed it is strange that in these days in which everyone knows that fake news is everywhere, football journalits are the one group left who still believe that they can get away with “news” which has no basis in reality or logic. But that is how it is
The Telegraph is right when it says, “These are early days in the dispute, yet it seems clear at this stage that Koscielny is far from clued up on the ins and outs of employment law in the UK,” and that really should have been the key point. I’ve no idea how bright Koscielny is, but this has all the hallmarks of an agent wanting to stir up some difficulty for the club, the agent telling his client, “Arsenal will give in” and showing him a few newspaper headlines about the chaos at Arsenal.
Indeed it all gets a bit stupid (if it wasn’t stupid enough) when the paper goes on to say,
“What does it say about Arsenal, for example, that the club captain is so desperate to leave that he has willingly taken a torch to his professional reputation? What will it say to the rest of the squad if Koscielny gets his wish? What will it do to Arsenal’s season if Koscielny is kept at the club, loitering at the training ground with no hope of regaining Emery’s trust?”
What it says about Arsenal is that their players can be manipulated by agents anxious for an extra transfer and by journalists who will endlessly print stories about Arsenal in chaos. As for the rest of the squad – well why doesn’t the Telegraph interview Bellerin if they want to know. He’s articulate, speaks excellent English, and usually tells journalists what he thinks.
As for Koscielny “loitering at the training ground,” only a journalist could be pathetically stupid enough to think that this is what would happen. UK employment law makes it quite clear that an employee who refuses to work or is disruptive in the work place can be sent home. Really, does no one in the legal department read what they are writing about at the Telegraph with a view to correcting these mistakes?
The piece continues with vague allegations about Arsenal’s dire financial position – all of which are ludicrously untrue. The club made a significant profit in the last two seasons for which figures have been reported on this site, and given that the last season reportedly had one-off payments of over £20m to staff who left, the club already had a boost to its figures for last season, before we factor in reaching the Europa final.
This piece is just another appalling pieces of gibberish I have yet seen published in a UK newspaper, and show for sure that the Telegraph will continue its battering of Arsenal, no matter how many fantasies they have to invent, secure in the knowlege that the rest of the newspaper industry and all its coat-tail-hanging blog followers will back up the story over and over again.
But it comes against the backdrop of over 100 years of articles knocking Arsenal, and since no one else will tackle subject of the media’s long term (and I really mean long term) bias against Arsenal I thought I might write a piece on the theme The media v The Arsenal.
It was meant to be a little piece, honest, but it has turned into a quite a long piece. So I’ll be publishing it in a series of episodes, following shortly.