Arsenal News
Arsenal News & Transfers
As featured on NewsNow: Arsenal newsArsenal News 24/7

Arsenal News, Only Arsenal, Blogs, Transfer News

Archives

July 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

The Premier League is under threat, more people take an interest, and a new man i/c PGMO. What now?

By Tony Attwood

The big threat facing Premier League football today is not so much from the failure of referees to follow the rules of  the game, or from the activities of the ultra-secretive PGMO, but from the persistence of immature football journalism that fails to examine these topics properly.

I thought on this today seeing the growth in the number of media sources, from newspapers to football blogs that are now starting to treat the football referee issue slightly more seriously than before.  Talking about the refs is in danger of becoming mainstream!

Certainly when we started nine years ago, any mention of a referee making errors was howled down as a simple excuse for an Arsenal defeat.  The mainstream media ignored the issue, or worse, published PGMO press releases claiming that 98% of referee decisions were correct and that the PGMO were at the forefront of considering video refereeing.

This approach however enhanced the frustration and alienation from the media by fans, as it was, and still is, made possible through the careful exclusion of certain film clips from the TV programmes.  As a result Match of the Day can appear to consider the “referee issue” by only showing certain aspects of the game, and then claiming that in fact Arsenal benefited from gaining an offside goal at the end.   What they carefully avoid showing is another foul in the area which should clearly have given Arsenal an earlier penalty.

It is in fact, fake analysis masquerading as a programme talking about the event that “all the fans are talking about” while ignoring other events.

So we have moved from a situation in which most fans don’t know too much about how PGMO operates, and how newspapers and TV sanitise their footballing output, to one in which growing numbers of fans know there is something odd going on.  From a time nine years ago when no one seemed to know what PGMO was, to a time when most people appreciate it is not quite all that we might wish it to be.

This shift in knowledge however has left a whole bunch of people in a difficult position.  To ignore what is going on with refereeing and the PGMO leaves the blogs on one hand and the mass media on the other, with a problem in their reporting.  To move over to Untold’s position requires a total change of direction, and the gathering together of resources and data which we have only managed to get through the amazing dedication and hardwork of Walter, Andrew and Usama across the years.

To take the mass media first, I have never known for sure which of three possible reasons has encouraged newspapers and broadcast media to support PGMO’s statements about the general accuracy of referees while avoiding the issue of the PGMO itself, its Calciopoli style approach to refereeing and its hyper secrecy.

One reason could be that it is part of the deal between the Premier League and the TV companies it licenses.  “You cannot overtly suggest that referees are often only 50% or 60% accurate, nor can you state that the ‘it all evens out in the end’ argument is totally untrue,” or words to that effect could well be part of the contract.

Another could be that the newspapers don’t want to step out of line with the rest of the media.  Curiously although the blogs and bloggettas could have used their position to challenge the dominant media vision of football years ago most have traditionally taken their line from the mainstream media.  Indeed quite a few have criticised and laughed at Untold, seeing our interest in refereeing as a by-product of our support for the club, the manager and the players.    Also many blogs try to ape the media in their approach, suggesting through their style that they have an overview.  The “Arsenal fans will be worried that…” style of make believe.

A third could be that if it becomes clear that there is something seriously odd about the way refereeing is done in the Premier League (which is quite clearly the case, given the paucity of the number of refs and the need for the tiny elite to rush from one fixture to another) people might stop gambling on football, and might turn away from the sponsors – and it is the gambling companies and sponsors that help pay for the whole operation.

But now we have a move.   Not a complete uprising expressing concern that the whole setup is dubious but a sort of low level challenge to Untold.   The Sun had its unnamed “experts” examine a dozen or so games last season and gave a fair reporting on errors – but didn’t keep it up, and didn’t consider consistent bias.  The Telegraph stopped running PGMO press releases and ran a few critical commentaries instead.  And now we find half a dozen blogs and bloggettas commentating on refereeing in a manner that seems to be a sort of shorthand version of the work of Walter, Andrew and Usama.

I asked my colleagues who write about refereeing regularly on Untold to give me their views on what the blogs and bloggettas were doing, and the general view seems to be that they are using Match of the Day as their source which, as Andrew said, “of course precludes most of the wrong decisions as they have already been edited out of the official narrative.

“I noticed that Hackett in his usual way only mentioned three controversial incidents from our game at the weekend, the sending off and the two penalties that were given and his opinion was that the referee was correct in the two that went against us and was wrong with our penalty.  He ignored the not given penalty for us, the not given red cards for the two elbows on Mustafi, the red card for the high foot on Kos and the yellow instead of red card from the player who injured himself in bringing down Özil.”

 In short, they, like the newspapers, are taking tentative steps into the field, but are baulking at putting together a team for a proper analysis.  It’s a shame because the workload in what we are doing is beyond belief, and if we could work together and jointly publish the results, I would not feel so guilty about just how much work I ask my colleagues to do.

And as Andrew added, “Interestingly this week there have been highly critical pieces on the overall standard of refereeing from Arseblog, Le Grove, 7amkickoff and the Daily Canon.  Not often they all share the same opinion as ourselves!”

So, after nine years of activity and thousands and thousands of hours’ work from Walter in particular, we’ve helped to get the topic on the agenda – which is no mean achievement given the absolute denial that there has been from on high.

And now we hear that PGMO has a new Chair in the shape of Mike Foster.   He started in football in 1973 at the Football League where he spent 19 years, and played semi-pro football.

In 1992 he joined the Premier League as its first General Secretary and is the only current Premier League member of staff to have been at the League since its inception.  That might be a good thing – or a bad thing.  Time will tell.

He was also Acting Chief Executive for six months in 1999, and for the last three years he has been the League’s Director of Football – overseeing all technical, football administration, and regulatory matters.

That means that he knows exactly what PGMO is up to with its structure that is utterly out of step with the other major leagues in Europe, its ludicrously tiny number of refs and its abject secrecy.  New broom?  I’m having doubts.

His is however described as “the driving force behind the 2013/14 introduction of goal-line technology in the Premier League,” so again, maybe a little chink of light there.  But where the press release heralding Mr Foster’s arrival falls on stony ground is with this statement…

Foster’s biggest legacy will be the unparalleled reputation the Premier League has for integrity and good governance.

That is hard to take.  The PL employ PGMO and has at best allowed and at worst encouraged PGMO to become utterly secret, and to have a number of referees which makes Type III match fixing easier rather than harder.  This doesn’t mean that Type III match fixing takes place – just that if you wanted to introduce it into a major European league, the PL would be the league you would choose, because of the utter secrecy of PGMO and the tiny number of referees it employs.

But Mike Foster said, “I am an advocate for new technology which can assist with decision making provided it does not alter the dynamics of the game or undermine the role of the referee.  I look forward to playing my part in the continued development of refereeing and to ensuring that PGMOL’s Match Officials continue to be recognised as being the best in the world.”

Whatever the national media, the blogs and the bloggettas do, we’ll hold him to that.

If you appreciate what we do and would like to help Untold Arsenal, please

  • Follow us on Twitter @UntoldArsenal
  • Follow us on Facebook (UntoldArsenalToday)

The more followers we get, then the more it helps to spread the word.

Recent Posts

19 comments to The Premier League is under threat, more people take an interest, and a new man i/c PGMO. What now?

  • Andy Mack

    By far the biggest threat to the PL that they have control over is the possibility of PGMO corruption for gambling purposes. They can organise the structure so that becomes a very minor possibility but they insist on leaving it where it’s a very real possibility.

    The greatest threat that they have very little control over is the TV income disappearing/reducing dramatically. Irrespective of the PLs efforts, the TV companies themselves decide what they are prepared to pay for the ‘product’ and if they want to promoted base-ball instead of football, or Championship football as ‘real football’ instead of PL football, then they will. If they all want to pay 50% less for the rights in the next auction or walk away, then they will.
    Yes it’s seriously unlikely but it’s the TV companies choice and they will do whatever’s the best for them (and their viewers/subscribers). It’s completely out of the hands of the PL…

  • Mandy Dodd

    Interesting, but suspect this appointment will do little. Too many vested interests. Does it weaken the beyond useless Mike Riley in any way?

    Know I have mentioned this before, but our own Ivan Gazidis sits very close to these seats of power, including The Professional Game Board

    http://www.arsenal.com/the-club/corporate-info/the-arsenal-board

    from what I have read of IG, he is a man of integrity, as have been his family. I am surprised he puts up with some of what is clearly going on, unless he knows a lot more than we do, or is maybe trying to improve things from within?

  • WalterBroeckx

    “that PGMOL’s Match Officials continue to be recognised as being the best in the world”…. oops…. what a mistake to make…
    They are not Mike, they are not. Or maybe the English media considers them the best in the world. Like they consider any England team going to a world cup or European championship as the best team in the tournament? They aren’t, Mike, they are not.

  • Norman14

    Andy:

    Fair comments, but of course SKY get a double wammie with owning both TV and betting companies.

    Like Mandy, I don’t think much is going to change with this appointment. The only “group” that can change football in this country is the supporters. The fact that the media have driven a wedge between supporters of different clubs, means that this will be difficult to achieve. Even worse, the FA controlled media have been shown to incite divisions amongst supporter groups within one club, and that is VERY unhealthy. (BT showing the AAA banners is an example). Print media continually make statements on behalf of supporters – as in “Arsenal supporters are unhappy with …..” and these lies are seemingly neither illegal nor libelous.

    Manipulation of facts by Mass Media is nothing new – Robert Wyatt wrote about it in his 1985 song, Mass Medium. Here’s a couple of lines:

    “And as history slips out of view
    Bated breath for the nine o’clock news
    Reassembled right before your very eyes:
    Innuendo, rumour and lies”

  • Norman14

    Walter:

    Maybe he means they are best in the world at manipulating games now that the Italians have been busted 😉

  • Dammy

    Is it a step in the right direction time and the introduction of video assisted refereeing (VAR) will tell. I appreciate that refs are human and to err is to be human. However these errors cumulatively cost people their jobs, livelihoods, and sanity. It is crucial the errors are kept to an acceptable margin of error.
    I will be ong gone but boldly claim referees will be obsolete in a hundred years.

  • austinpaul ojeaga ksp

    Untold has done a lot wit regard to issues raised in today’s posts; my take is dat as Arsene has bin charged by d FA I tink its d right moment for all refereeing atrocities to b succintly brought to d dOorstep of d FA ; d 3 videos in today’s post by Walter nd many more shuld b tendered as evidence of d continuos provocative , frustrating nd open bias refereeing of PGMOB against Arsenal over d seasons; it is tym Arsenal as a Club reacts to dis iniquities dat cem unabating! Shalom.

  • Wengever

    “This doesn’t mean that type III match fixing takes place”

    Nor does it mean it does not take place. Whichever way you cut it, our history shows something being fixed. Perhaps “fixing” itself has a far more elaborate form than that related to gambling and crime. Even “respectable”governments have secretive “dirty tricks” agencies;could this be the cause of reprehensible fix? A premier league referee interviewed on NBCSports in the US, spoke of referees managing the interests of multiple stake-holders’ interests. Clearly, from the latter, much more than the rules of the game is at play. Such a situation and concern, if made transparent would overtly undermine what fans expect from a referee – hence the secrecy perhaps?
    I suspect, in the fashion of “bad news sells better than good news,” the pgmol and premier league are employing a strategy of negativity to raise interest and a form of support for the sport. Something like the strategy of how a monstrous enemy is used to both unite a nation and construct that nation through endless “talking points” that steer the conversation from serious scrutiny.

    My apologies for such a long response.

    We have to remember that football as sport is a social institution.

  • Wengever

    Sorry tha “apology should have been at the end

  • Norman14

    Mike Dean:

    The “penalty” that Dean gave in his “demoted” game last week SHOULD ensure that he is never allowed to referee another game – ever!

    John Moss:

    Like Dean, Mariner and Madley, John Moss is not physically fit enough to referee a first class match. He looks out of breath after about 15 minutes.

    I see we have Sian Massey-Ellis on the line for the Watford game, so at least half of the Offside decisions will be correct. That’s if Marriner takes any notice of course.

  • The mirror on the 4th of September 2016, the reporter was John Cross,Hasley accused Mike shit Riley Head of PGMOL for putting official under pressure to change their decision(so mike is retired now or?).Who was the Chairman of the FA when Leicester stole in broad day light the premier league trophy from the Arsenal??He was once a Leicester commander in chief.
    Leicester got away with almost everything.We know but who cares,two offside goals are scored against us but no one even says a word,but kos is hit on the head and my, its all over. What a bunch of sewer rats.

  • Andrew Crawshaw

    Norman, Mike Dean is back next week despite his dreadful decision.

    You are, of course absolutely correct with all of your points!

  • Norman14

    Just got the following press release from PGMOB:

    Hello,

    Mike Riley

  • We regularly get comments on Untold which include the statement “I bet you won’t print this”.

    One turned up in relation to this article, but since it claimed to be from an email address that it turns out, does not exist, then the author can be happy to know that he/she won the bet. We didn’t print it.

  • GoingGoingGooner

    interesting…Klopp’s interview after being put out of the EFL against Southampton. In the context of what he claims is an obvious handball against Shane Long he was talking about the offside goal of ManU against them…he said that everyone (at the club) said it was 2,3 yards offside “AND YET NOBODY SPEAKS ABOUT IT…Do I HAVE TO SPEAK ABOUT IT?…IS IT MY JOB TO GET A FINE?”…Of course nobody will speak about it…The PGMO is 99% correct…Poor deluded foreigner.

  • Menace

    GGG -sad but true. Any manager speaks the truth & the corrupt FA & PGMOL will be on to them like the bad breath out of a whistle (PGMOL speciality).

  • Norman14

    Wenger has accepted the FA charge but asked for a personal hearing.

  • Andy Mack

    GGG the depressing part of Klopps comment is that the press still don’t seem to understand that it’s their job to ask questions about the refs mistakes.
    Klopp is just saying it because the hacks are so poor at their own jobs that if he doesn’t say it then no one else will…

  • finsbury

    Who can forget the attempt by the press corps to smear the world class, well travelled and widely respected coach Rafael Benitez for daring to suggest that all is not dandy with the pgMOB.

    Yet still people will try to defend this pathetic and transparent and indefensible mob.

    Perhaps these stand up defenders of the beautiful game know more about football then the likes of Benitez, Klopp, Guardiola and yes Wenger too.

    What are odds? What odds will I get on the above from the bookies that own team X, Y or Z?