21 responses

  1. WalterBroeckx
    09/02/2017

    A sin bin for referees would also not be bad at times 😉

  2. Zuruvi
    09/02/2017

    IFAB needs to be reformed.
    I think as football is a worldwide game, IFAB should represent all continents/federations (EUFA, CONCAFA, AFCON, etc. etc.).
    Each federation should have one vote and FIFA the same number of votes as the number of federations.

    Changes to the rules of football should be by 60 or 75% majority.

  3. Zuruvi
    09/02/2017

    Just imagine how unfair it would seem if the rules of football were decided by FIFA in conjunction with Germany, Belgium, Holland and Slovenia only.

    Or if the rules were decided by Zambia, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Lesotho and FIFA.

    The Sun, The Mirror and the Telegraph would be persecuting FIFA for not moving with the times.
    The FA would be screaming from all roof tops that IFAB and FIFA are stuck in history and dysfunctional.

  4. insideright
    09/02/2017

    Given that, according to the Chelsea manager, rules are interpreted differently in different countries wouldn’t it be a good idea to get more consistency as well as (maybe) improvement?

  5. MickHazel
    09/02/2017

    Tony writes…
    ‘The PGMO is running secret non-live video ref trials this season, but in keeping with its normal approach, is not telling anyone about it.’
    The PGMOL will probably say they do not need help from technology as any improvement over the current 96% accuracy of their decisions it may offer would be marginal thus making it’s introduction pretty pointless.

  6. Gord
    09/02/2017

    If requiring 75% votes (or similar) is to be a guiding factor, allocating FIFA the same number of votes as the number of votes for all the other parties probably isn’t a great idea. As it stands now, FIFA effectively has a veto on any proposal. I don’t think that is helpful.

    Alternatively, the FIFA block of votes could be broken up in _independent_ parts. With indepedence being important. For instance, having the sports medicine function within FIFA having an independent vote would be useful.

  7. Norman14
    09/02/2017

    UK MP’s today gave a vote of No Confidence in the FA to reform itself, and will seek to legislate changes that enforce the FA Board to implement change.

  8. ARSENAL 13
    10/02/2017

    Sinbin,

    Will never help for us. When rules are interpreted differently, how will any new rule help us? When our opponents get carded for persistent fouling only after 60-70 mins of the game, how will sin bin like rule work? Also ARSENAL will have to play the whole game with 10 men, as we always get carded for the very first foul….

  9. Nitram
    10/02/2017

    ARSENAL 13

    I have to agree. Just another way to screw us.

    You can just picture it. Hanging on valiantly to a 1 goal lead at OT with 10 minutes to go.

    You tell me, under such circumstances, what are the odds of Xhaka ending up in the sin bin, assuming he’s managed to remain on the pitch until such a time in the first place of course.

    Our players are s**t scared to put a tickle in now. Did I say ‘tickle’, I meant tackle. So heaven knows what they’d be like with a visit to the ‘sin bin’ hanging over there every move.

    It would be a disaster.

  10. Leon
    10/02/2017

    Nothing new about this. The great late Ian Wooldridge (Daily Mail) advocated Ice hockey style sin bins more than thirty years ago, and it’s surfaced regularly since. I think it would be an excellent idea for minor card offenses like swearing at officials, technical offences, time wasting etc., while fouling should be treated in the same more severe way as it now is.

  11. Leon
    10/02/2017

    It’s worth pointing out that any rule changes are not made to assist or penalise Arsenal or any other one club, but the whole of football generally.
    The idiocy here sometimes!

  12. Leon
    10/02/2017

    …but are for the whole improvement of football generally…..

  13. MickHazel
    10/02/2017

    Leon
    Who is guilty of idiocy? Who has said the rule is being made specifically to penalize Arsenal?

  14. WalterBroeckx
    10/02/2017

    you have the law and how the ref will apply the law… that is the concern here

  15. Menace
    10/02/2017

    My origins are complex but I think IFAB is correctly organised & has sufficient representation to ensure the governance of the Laws of The Game.

    Where any change needs to be made is in FIFA. It needs to be disbanded completely & organised in an open transparent way with democratic election of representatives every 4 years & with no successful candidate allowed a subsequent term.

    The four home nations must retain their position in IFAB. It maintains a historical connection for the game.

  16. Menace
    10/02/2017

    PS let me not forget the major change that needs to be made to ensure honest football in UK. The FA & the PGMOL must lead the home nations with change in its home for geriatrics of dubious origins. The most pathetic of organisations in sport.

  17. Leon
    10/02/2017

    Mick

    Arsenal 13 & Nitram are suggesting that we would be done over as a result. At least that’s the way it looks to me. No attempt at this is good/bad for football, but this is how it will affect Arsenal and with stupid scenarios.

  18. MickHazel
    10/02/2017

    Leon
    Yes I appreciate that but they did not say the reason the rule will be changed is specifically to screw Arsenal which is what you are implying they said.

  19. Leon
    10/02/2017

    Mick

    Yeah, bit OTT by me, I didn’t actually mean that they saw the change as Arsenal specific, but that they’re not looking at the impact of a rule change on football generally.

  20. ARSENAL 13
    10/02/2017

    Hhahhahaha Leon,

    Any rule change for the better of the game is always welcome. Which includes aids for referees.

    Now for what I’d written earlier. There are enough rules in the game….Yet we see enough. How it gets applied in ARSENAL games…Just look at referee preview and see how often the predictions are right…..

  21. Menace
    10/02/2017

    Leon – the rules or Laws are not different for any team but the PGMOL apply them differently for some teams. The corruption is not in the Laws but in the organisations that are supposed to police those Laws. It’s a little like the stop & search laws that were more used on black & ethnic minorities than on whites. It is an issue that has not resolved itself as yet and raises its head in football with similar bias (perhaps less colour prejudice).

Back to top
mobile desktop