How the media’s hypocrisy over VAR is both astonishing and shameful.



By Nitram and Tony Attwood

A recent headline in the Sun read, “DISGRACED: Mikel Faces Ban Over Ref Rant.”  It was a clear case of judging first and having the trial later.  We can only feel relief that the people who own and write for the Sun don’t (as yet, at any rate) run our court system.

Yet this is what their own Mark Irwin had to say about referees and VAR in particular, following the Arsenal vs Manchester City match a few weeks ago.  It was quoted in the Sun…

“What exactly is refs’ chief Webb hoping to achieve with match officials Mic’dup?   “Because we really don’t want to hear him and Michael Oliver telling us how VAR has f***** up”

“We’re already well aware of the wrong calls the Premier League’s elite officials have made this season.  Replaying those errors with running commentary from Stockley Park is just going to p*** us off even more.   So maybe Webb should stay silent if the best he can come up with is ‘yes, we’re useless, but at least we are honest about it’”

So, if Artetas measured, if somewhat critical take on all things VAR is a ‘rant’, what on earth is “how VAR has f***ed up”?

That actually goes further and uses much more insulting language than Arteta used.  But the media can claim what they like it seems, but those within football don’t have that freedom.  And indeed we remember how Arsene Wenger suffered massive fines and suspensions (reduced or withdrawn when he appealed) for making comments about referees and international football bodies.

And some of Wenger’s comments were indeed informative and amusing.  Like the one about Uefa and Fifa being like car thieves, except that having taken your car and run it into the ground, they had it back demanding that you have it repaired and ready for next time.

To be fair to the Mirror their headlines about Arteta are not quite so bombastic although they still use the word ‘rant in the subheading:


Which rather suggests that the FA have reached their judgement first, and then will have the hearing later.  Which actually, doesn’t come as a surprise.

Indeed that Mirror comment is actually quite mild given the relentless attacks from them and their associated outlets over the years, but nevertheless they are hardly getting behind Arteta, which is a surprise given how nearly every one of their journalists pretty much agrees with every word he has said about referees.

For example, following a weekend of VAR controversy back in September 2022 the Mirror decided things were getting so bad they asked a range of their reporters what they thought of VAR, and how we should move forward with it. This is what they had to say about VAR back then:

James Nursey: “VAR is in the spotlight again after a disastrous controversial weekend which must test the faith of even the most ardent backers of the system.

“Fans could even be forgiven for pining for the days when we just left everything in the hands of the matchday referee on the pitch. There has since been a clamour for VAR to be ditched entirely with the likes of Jamie O’Hara hitting out…. the referees and VAR officials at Stockley Park do need to be held to account over the weekend’s fiasco.”

That is quite a change from today’s position.  But the writer at that time continued…

“Having legitimate goals ruled out is the last thing any supporters or teams deserve. I think the sensible plan is for the officials to review their performance, which is taking place, and for the Premier League to closely assess this winter’s World Cup where Fifa plan to use semi-automated offside technology.”

Or we might care to look at the Mirror’s Nathan Ridley who wrote, “The PGMOL can spout the clear and obvious narrative all they want, but that consistently hasn’t been the case, particularly this past weekend. What actually seems to determine whether a decision is checked or not is the amount of harassment officials receive from players and coaches in the immediate aftermath of incidents, or the magnitude of the game.”

Then the Mirror reporter David Maddock asked “What should we do with VAR?”  And his answer was “Just scrap it in its current form. We were supposed to get a discreet background system of checks, which corrected the massive and obvious howlers.

“Instead, we’ve got something that seems to forensically check everything. Waiting minutes and minutes to know if you’ve scored a goal is not what football is about. To then discover later that the officials making those laborious checks got it wrong, is insane. It drains the whole essence of sport.”

VAR operators should be “Held to account” made to “Review their performance” because it “Can’t continue in its current format” and “should be scrapped.”  These comments are all indicative of the Mirror’s take on the appalling standard of the VAR interventions, and that was a year ago, and as far as I can see it has just got even worse.

Arteta’s statement contained nothing any more contentious than the views expressed by five reporters in the Mirror. In fact he was less scathing than most, as he never suggested for one second it should be scrapped, just that its implementation needed to be improved, because as we stand today it is embarrassing.

Unfortunately, it seems the Sun and The Mirror haven’t got a clue that their very own reporters in fact agree with every word Arteta said.  And let’s not forget VAR has continued in the same incompetent fashion this year, and the reporters’ opinions haven’t changed either.  For example the Mirror in August this year said, “Despite the new season still being in its infancy, officials are already under pressure after a string of high-profile and contentious calls. Nottingham Forest are considering lodging an official complaint following their dramatic 3-2 defeat at Manchester United, with divisive calls on a red card and a penalty both going against the visitors.”

By 2 October this year, they were headlining, “VAR’s five howlers this season as PGMOL hold crisis talks to solve Liverpool fallout.”

After that game, Liverpool lodged a complaint and demanded to hear the audio between the officials, but that was okay apparently and did not result in any charge against the club. And The Mirror’s Samuel Meade summed it all up saying, “Those using it (VAR) have ‘failed’ Players, Managers, and Fans.”

And yet when Arteta speaks out in the same way, it is a “rant.”  The level of hypocrisy we are witnessing from the media is simply astonishing and actually shameful.

9 Replies to “How the media’s hypocrisy over VAR is both astonishing and shameful.”

  1. I was concerned to see that PGMOL sent one of their enforcers to referee Arsenal Ladies 3-0 win over Brighton in the WSL today. Very concerned.

  2. I was always told by my parents and teachers that it is better to be honest than hide issues. I see a classical case of ‘hiding’ the truth in order to fit a specific narrative rather than be honest about the incompetent referees. A long as the media has this attitude nothing will change. It may be interesting to hear their squealing if mr Arteta takes the problems from this year and highlight it to ask whether what he said is different to what others have said. That will cause quite a stir amongst the media & force them into the truth.
    Not a bad idea in my book/

  3. Well I find it fascinating that the so-called press does not state the obvious :

    VAR does not change a game’s outcome, VAR does not make bad decisions. Referees do

    And the logical conclusion is : don’t get rid of VAR, get rid of PGMOL

  4. Chris


    VAR in itself is a sound idea, it is the way it is being applied that is the problem. And the way it is being applied is exactly the same way referees referee matches. Inconsistently, not according to the Laws Of The game, in as much secrecy as possible, and without any accountability.

    Any one of those on their own would be bad enough, but to have a system so incompetently applied is a disgrace.

    But unforetuneately, as I have stated many many times, it is this very secrecy and non accountability to anyone other than the media, that allows them to apply the ‘Laws’ as inconsistently, or put another way, biasedly, as they wish.

    It is all manna from heaven for any official attempting to tilt the balance of a match without any fear of reprisals, at least not from the affected team.

    And this is how the media like it, so mark my words, this is how it will remain.

  5. Get everybody to agree that VAR is the problem and should be abolished and you will see open season for the refs. They will return to acting with more impunity. The problem with VAR is the incompetence of the people staffing it. It may be a good idea to have an independent body running VAR, much like how accounting staff do not audit themselves.

  6. Headline in the Daily Mirror today after the England match.

    “A terrible ref, some dreadful VAR decisions….”

    Contrast that statement with their silence after the shenanigans at St. James’ Park 2 weeks ago. The mainstream media are not to be trusted.

  7. seismic

    I said that very thing to Mrs N during the game about the commentators. Personally I don’t think the referee did cover himself in glory, but he was no worse than the abysmal performances we witness on a regular basis in the Premier League.

    The commentators didn’t shut up about it. They would never do that during a Premier League match. It’s as if they have an agreement that they cant criticise premier League referees. Surely not?

  8. It was a strange game. Dion “clueless” Dublin was on co-commentary ranting about Harry Maguire’s foul not being a penalty (which wasn’t given by the referee), although anybody with an IQ greater than 40 could see that it was. It just goes to show how TV pundits are unable to identify obvious fouls when they are serving their own agenda. Where have we seen that before?

  9. seismic

    That’s the numpty, Dublin, thank you seismic.

    Good grief, that guy is bad enough normally, but he really excelled himself in the ‘I am the most clueless pundit on the Planet’ competition on Monday evening. Outstanding performance!!

    Ironically, in comparison, the referee was actually quite good.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *