- Arsenal v Chelsea: the referee, recent comparisons and where is Abramovich?
- Arsenal v Chelsea: a visit from little Stamford Creek
By Bulldog Drummond
What I think most of us want most of the time is for referees to adopt the same view of the game as each other, so clubs and players and us supporters, know where they stand, and we know them not to be biased.
So let’s look first of all at our referee this weekend, (Chris Kavanagh) and how different he is from some of his fellows…
Referee | Games | Fouls pg | Pen pg | Yel pg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anthony Taylor | 25 | 20.92 | 0.36 | 2.92 |
Michael Oliver | 21 | 23.24 | 0.10 | 4.57 |
Chris Kavanagh | 18 | 21.78 | 0.17 | 5.06 |
Peter Bankes | 17 | 19.35 | 0.29 | 3.88 |
Robert Jones | 16 | 25.13 | 0.25 | 4.63 |
So these referees have all seen 16 or more Premier League games, and thus they are all expert men at the top of their profession. Yet Robert Jones sees 30% more fouls in each game than Peter Bankees. And let me stress that is not in just one game but in each and every game, on average.
With penalties, it gets even wilder. Anthony Taylor sees 260% more penalties per game than Michael Oliver. And Chris Kavanagh gives out 73% more yellow cards than Anthony Taylor.
So to put it very simply how many fouls, how many penalties and how many yellow cards there are waved around in each game depends mostly on who is the referee, not only who is playing.
And because of this, the results that we get also depend on who is the referee
Referee | Games | HomeWin% | AwayWin% | Draw% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anthony Taylor | 25 | 20.0 | 56.0 | 24.0 |
Michael Oliver | 21 | 28.6 | 42.9 | 28.6 |
Chris Kavanagh | 18 | 16.7 | 22.2 | 61.1 |
Peter Bankes | 17 | 58.8 | 35.3 | 5.9 |
Robert Jones | 16 | 18.8 | 25.0 | 56.3 |
And yes it is true, referees don’t come less in favour of home wins than Kavanagh. By comparison we might note that John Brooks has overseen 69.s% of his matches as home wins.
What Kavanagh is very, very good at is waving yellow cards. He has given out 91 yellow cards this season. Only Oliver has given out more, and he has overseen three more games this season than Kavanagh.
Now yellow cards are of interest because of the total yellow card table which shows Chelsea as the most yellow carded team in the league with 76, as opposed to Arsenals’ 53 – that is Chelsea have had 43% more yellows than Arsenal.
But now lets look at where these pesky yellow things come from
Team | Fouls | Unprofessional | Other |
---|---|---|---|
Chelsea | 42 | 8 | 28 |
Arsenal | 33 | 2 | 25 |
So you may be asking, what does “other” mean? And I hope you are asking that because Untold Arsenal is also asking that, and we have even gone so far as to ask the people who have compiled this table what “other” means, and do you know, they either can’t or won’t tell us. This is alarming because 47% of Arsenal’s yellow cards come from “other” reasons.
And no one seems to know what those other reasons are. We’ve written to all the people we can think of who might know what “other” means in this context but none of them want to explore the issue with us.
If you know, or if you know anyone who might know, or indeed if you feel you would like to take a guess, then please send in a comment, because it is a bit dodgy not knowing quite what almost half of Arsenal’s cards are for.
What we can say is that none of these “other” offences are for diving, for the official table includes a column for that and it shows that not a single player this season has been carded for diving this season.
So it is not for a foul, not for diving, and not for unprofessional conduct, but it is something else.
Now, I guess we would not worry about this if we were dealing with a referee organisation that is open and above board in everything it does, but PGMO isn’t. It is a secret society, so we can’t write to them and ask them. We can’t consult their website because they don’t have one.
And we can’t ask how come Bournemouth commit twice as many fouls a ManC (in the eyes of the referees). Maybe Bournemouth are a thoroughly dirty team, but of course, we can’t inspect any of the data.
Plus, we can’t ask why John Brooks gives out 5.46 yellow cards on average in each game while Stuart Atwell gives out 3.47 yellow cards per game. That is a difference of 57% which seems rather large when it comes to something as important as yellow cards. I mean, a club that sees Atwell a lot is pretty much bound to be picking up fewer cards than a club that sees Brooks.
But on all such subjects, PGMO and their pals in the media remain utterly silent.
Chris “I’ve got no choice” Kavanagh.
Arsenal have averaged 1 point per game in the three matches he has refereed this season. We have averaged 2.08 points per game in the other 25 matches.
I don’t trust this referee.
Seismic
There is no tangible reason why we should trust him based on his performances to date.
seismic
“Chris “I’ve got no choice” Kavanagh”.
From everything we have seen, this notion that referees have ‘no choice’ other than to enforce certain rules to the letter of the law, with regards to certain offences, is so utterly discredited as to be laughable.
Both before and since ‘the letter of the law’ was applied to us with such vigour early in the season, we have seen scores of similar offences completely ignored. We have seen worse offences completely ignored.
This is undeniable.
But it appears it is only us that continue to ask why? The silence is deafening.
In fact it is worse than silence because they actually turn it on it’s head and use it as a stick with which to beat us.
We are accused of being paranoid or conspiracy theorists.
Beyond a joke.
It happened again today.
Arsenal were Yellow carded for every conceivable yellow.
Chelsea were Yellow carded, only if it became impossible not to do so.
@Nitram I am fed up with the argument that refs are consistent with their decisions.
I have seen lots of games where decisions appear completely arbitrary. They have nothing, absolutely nothing to do with consistency but more to do with random interpretation of the rules of the game. Sometimes it can happen with seconds of one incident to the next.
The only explanation for this is that the officials are working to a narrative.