Why a club making complaints about referees in public is probably not a good idea

 

 

By Tony Attwood

Thierry Henry remains of course one of my all-time favourite players (the other, equally of course, was Dennis Bergkamp).   And after a spell in international management it seems he is now back working as a pundit.   And as such he has been getting rather critical of Mikel Arteta for …. well you know what since it is the same complaint that turns up in every broadcast and every news story about Arsenal.   For not signing a centre forward.

Of course we know that Arsenal’s goal tally dropped by 17% last season when the entire forward line and the back-up players all got injured.  (Although the club still scored more than 2015/16 when they also came second).   But next season the forward line will be back together.   So maybe we should judge their, and Arteta’s, management performance across the years.  Let’s have a look…

 

Season Goals Pos Top Scorer Top man’s goals
2019–20 56 8th Aubemeyang 29
2020–21 55 8th Lacazette 17
2021–22 61 5th Saka 12
2022–23 88 2nd Saka, Martinelli, Odegard 15 each
2023–24 91 2nd  Saka 20
2024–25 69 2nd Havertz 15

 

The simple fact is that even with all these injuries Arsenal were still the third highest scoring team in the league last season, and last season’s total was still the third best in the  league – a drop down of one place.   So why would the club suddenly want to change its whole approach when basically the three men who contributed everything in 2022/23 and were joint top scorers, were all injured for part of last season?

Now the Henry commentary probably doesn’t reflect what he actually said, because newspaper commentaries rarely do, so the headline from the Independent that “Arsenal legend Thierry Henry questions Mikel Arteta’s failure to sign striker: ‘He had time’,” is probably inaccurate or out of context. 

But of course, Arsenal are not the only team to get this treatment.  The media boosted Unai Emery as a brilliant manager arguing that he achieves wonders wherever he goes, and who only failed at Arsenal because Arsenal is a rubbish club that never wins anything,

Yet the fact that his side only won one of the last 11 games in which he was Arsenal manager and that he left the club resting seven points above Southampton (that club sitting in its regular relegation position), and 27 points behind the leaders is ignored.

Arteta rescued Arsenal from that dire position and has since produced three second-place finishes in a row, the best run in the last 20 years.  And yet people who have not been successful managers want to tell the club and its manager how to do the job!

The implication has to be either that management is easy and everyone can see how to do it, or that Arsenal have a stupid inept manager.  Or both.

But let’s pause a moment longer and look at what Emery has done at Villa since he left Arsenal not only in ruins but also carrying Nicolas Pépé on whom Emery used up most of his transfer budget.   That was by any standard a “transfer gamble” which backfired.   And perhaps with this in mind we might look at the headline in the Independent which reads, “The hard decisions Aston Villa now face after transfer gamble backfires.”

There is of course no mention of the fact that Emery is known for inept transfer gambles that backfire and yet despite this he generally gets an excellent press.  His club’s goal difference last season was 28 worse than Arsenal – and yet that was Arsenal playing much of the season without most of its forward line!

As a result, Villa is not in the Champions League again and the Independent adds that “there is now an uncertain future for Morgan Rogers, Emi Martinez, Marcus Rashford, Marco Asensio and more.”

And this was the manager that Arsenal had before Arteta.  A manager who goes around spending a fortune on players who turn out to be not that good after all.   So Emery is a nearly man who might well keep his job.  Which in turn could well mean that Villa are one less club Arsenal have to worry about next season.

But let us go one little step further.   Why did Villa fail to get that extra point that would have given them Champions League football next season?   It seems it was because the referee, a Mr Thomas Bramall, was “a significant contributing factor to the club not qualifying for the Champions League.”   And that comment comes not from me but from Aston Villa who have put in a complaint to PGMOL.   And yet, that goal came in a 2-0 defeat.   Errrr……   

Now we might note a couple of things here.   One is that Emi Martinez got himself sent off in that game.   Another is that Arsenal can, as we have shown, quite rightly have a number of complaints about referees.    We mention them from time to time, but if Arsenal as a club are frustrated by them (and I believe that is the case) they most certainly don’t make the complaints in public.  They do it privately, to PGMO, and they talk with other clubs in private. 

Meanwhile we get articles such as Aston Villa file complaint over choice of referee for Man Utd clash following that match, while Arsenal seemingly just get on with it, doing their complaining in private, which given the fact that complaints against referees rarely has any impact at all, seems a better idea.

2 Replies to “Why a club making complaints about referees in public is probably not a good idea”

  1. I think for a future article would be on the opposing fans that always chant sam old Arsenal always cheating when our players are fouled. Whether its true as they make out.

  2. Prompted by the reference here. I must admit that I found the Emi Martinez sending off rather amusing. The terrible suicidal pass which became a brilliant through-ball for the MU player, followed by the Keystone Cops challenge which took the player down. Then the look of bewilderment by Martinez who didn’t appear to understand why he got the red card.

    An alternative conspiracy theory, (entirely unsubstantiated) is that he was aware that his time at Villa is at an end, so decided to give them a F… You farewell.

Leave a Reply