*current season, which of course is unfinished. The number in the third column (number of yellow cards in the season) will rise, of course, but it is very likely that Arsenal will remain near the foot of these tables for the number of fouls and cards committed during the season.
The fact is that whichever way these numbers are spun, Arsenal are not the dirtiest team in the league. In fact, the opposite is true. Arsenal have been between 15th and 17th for the number of fouls and between 18th and 20th for the number of yellow cards in recent seasons. The notion that Arsenal are the dirtiest team in the league is not only untrue, it is the reverse of the truth.
Which raises two questions. One is how do journalists and commentators get away with citing the opposite of the truth, and the other is why do they do it.
As for how journalists get away with this, that is simple: they know that when statistics in football are published, virtually no one else checks them. And indeed, even if someone else does check them, the only place they can publish such figures would be on a blog – if they have access to one. So numbers quoted in the media are taken as gospel, and I believe that is a problem.
As for why they pick on Arsenal, it is an easy story with which to fill a page of the paper. The notion that Arsenal are cheating appeals to many of the supporters of the other 19 clubs in the Premier League who are frustrated at Arsenal’s success (and as I openly admit, just as I am frustrated by ManCs success achieved through their abuse of the financial system). Now with this story of Arsenal being the great fouling club, supporters of other teams can feel that “Arsenal only did well because they cheated.” So readers like the story, and keep reading that newspaper.
