- Transfer madness – where does Arsenal stand on overpriced transfers?
- Are Asenal “Bottle Jobs” or is that just another stuck with which to beat us?
By Tony Attwood
So maybe we were right. As the Guardian says in its headline: “Lavish spending fails to fix Tottenham’s big issue – the lack of a soul or spine. It might be too early to push the panic button but Roberto De Zerbi faces a huge task if he is to turn ‘Spurs’ around.”
My view is simple – for a couple of years they have tried the “new managers and lots of new expensive purchases” approach and it has failed and of late they have come 17th. So what do they do this summer? The same again.
But if I may quote in a little more from the article, “Time for Tottenham to start panicking? This is, of course, a subtle trick question. Tottenham is one of those clubs that never actually stops panicking. They panic when they concede and they panic when they score.”
And pushing my luck with quoting from the same publication, try this, “Since beating Aston Villa 4-1 in late 2024, Tottenham have gone behind 44 times in all competitions and come back to win precisely zero of them.”
But here was something new. The reason that Tottenham have utterly failed to sell the naming rights of the stadium, is because “every visiting side gets to own the place”. A clever little bit of journ.
And I promise this is the last one – and you really should go and read the article yourself through the link above, “Over the past 12 months, Aston Villa have won the same number of domestic fixtures at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (two) as Tottenham.” But at last a newspaper reporter agrees with Untold – it has taken a long old time to get there, but they have in the end. “Tottenham are discovering that buying new footballers is the easy part.”
Arteta showed that and Arsenal had the patience and had confidence in him to let him do it and finish eighth in the league twice while he built his team. Fortunately for us, (because I am enjoying the show) Tottenham didn’t go to the classes where they aught that lesson.
What is interesting here is the foot of the table because the bottom three clubs have all played the maximum number of games….
| Pos |
Club
|
P | W | D | L | F | A | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 |
Coventry
|
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 19 |
Crystal Palace
|
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 20 |
Tottenham Ho
|
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
But that table needs to be compared with the spending table… becuase the point is not that spending is wrong. Spending is fine as long as you can buy the right players for your team, and sell at a decent price the player who can’t deliver for your club, but maybe could elsewhere. This table again comes from the Guardian, and is perhaps the most helpful one that we can find.
| # | Club | spent | Arrivals | received | Departures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chelsea | €397.95m | 9 | €273.65m | 8 |
| 2 | Tottenham Hot | €354.70m | 4 | €165.55m | 9 |
| 3 | Manchester City | €273.70m | 6 | €336.92m | 8 |
| 4 | Newcastle Un | €253.00m | 7 | €275.50m | 3 |
| 5 | Arsenal | €227.10m | 4 | €46.15m | 4 |
As you can see Tottenham and Arsenal are on pretty much the same balance for this summer’s window, both have a negative results. What Arsenal have done which is so different is kept the same manager throughout and allowed him to mould and shape his team as he goes along edging the site toward it peak performance.
I’ve gone over his record of finishing places so many times I am sure you are bored with it (8th, 8th, 5th, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 1st) but compare that wit Tottenham of late..: 6th, 7th, 4th, 8th, 5th, 17th, 17th
| P | W | D | L | F | A | Pts | Pos | Manager | |
| 2019–20 | 38 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 61 | 47 | 59 | 6th | José Mourinho |
| 2020–21 | 38 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 68 | 45 | 62 | 7th | |
| 2021–22 | 38 | 22 | 5 | 11 | 69 | 40 | 71 | 4th | Nuno E Santo |
| 2022–23 | 38 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 70 | 63 | 60 | 8th | Ryan Mason |
| 2024–25 | 38 | 11 | 5 | 22 | 64 | 65 | 38 | 17th | A Postecoglou |
| 2025–26 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 48 | 57 | 41 | 17th | Thomas Frank |
| 2026-27 | Roberto De Zerb |
Surely anyone can see that this approach has not been working, while the Arsenal approach of finding a manager and sticking with hm has worked. And as I have agreed in the past Arsenal, don’t get it right every time, for most certainly the current Aston Villa manager was not the right man for Arsenal, and the club were right to sack him,.
Since 1996 Arsenal have had Wenger, Emery and Arteta, and although all three have had multiple Arsenal fans demanding his removal, sticking with two of those three turned out to be the right thing to do. Yes Arsenal had to wait between 2003–04, and 2025–26 to win the league twice, but I still think that was a better wait than Tottenham have had, and are having. Find a manager who delivers, and stick with him.

J’estime qu’au vue de ce que nous vivons depuis plusieurs années, il est plus que temps que nous puissions revoir de fond en comple notre politique de recrutements des jours.
A ce sujet, je pense ́n’est pas être le premier fanatique d’́Arsenal a soulevé ce problème et plus que temps que le Comité puisse nous écouter.
présentement, et comme d’habitude, on se voit obligé de recourir aux joueurs disponibles à quelles heures de la clôture du marché de transfert, parce qu’on n’a plus le choix. Il est temps de mettre un terme à cette pratique, car il y va de l’avenir de notre équipe.
I am publishing the above comment as it was sent to me. I have done my best to translate it – apologies if I have made any errors.
I believe that given what we have been experiencing for several years, it is more than time for us to thoroughly review our recruitment policy. In this regard, I don’t think I am the first Arsenal fan to raise this issue, and it is high time the Committee listened to us. Currently, as usual, we find ourselves forced to rely on available players at the closing hours of the transfer market because we have no other choice. It is time to put an end to this practice, as it concerns the future of our team.
Tony
Thanks for translating it, but to be fair Tony, I still don’t understand what he’s saying.