By Bulldog Drummond
The Guardian has come out with one of its famous statements: “if Arsenal show up and play with an ounce of positivity then Ralph Hasenhüttl’s usual forward-thinking approach should allow for plenty of chances. Chances have so often gone unfinished this season, however.”
So we wondered if it is true that, “Chances have so often gone unfinished” with the implication that other teams do better. We thought we had better find out.
The Premier League provide a statistic showing how many big chances each team has had to date. However not every goal comes from a “Big chance”. But we can still find some interesting points here since the Guardian has brought this up.
Arsenal are seventh in the league total of goal scorers this season with 45 goals. They are fifth in the league, so there is not too much disparity there, and it is obviously fair to say that if the club wants to do better next season it has to score more.
But clearly, not all big chances are converted and to see how often this occurs we’ve taken the Premier League’s list of big chances created and the number of goals scored and divided one into the other.
What we get is a number of clubs that have scored more goals than they have had big chances (which is to say a number over 100% in the final column).
And when we look at this table what is clear is that Arsenal’s problem is not likely to be that “chances so often go unfinished” as the Guardian proclaims without any evidence whatsoever, but rather that Arsenal are not creating enough chances.
In fact Arsenal have created 34 “big chances” but scored 45 goals, which means that the goalscorers are the best in the league at converting what one must presumably call “small chances” into goals. That is a real positive for Arsenal because it is a much harder task than having a big centre forward powering the ball into the net when just faced with a keeper.
The table is given below, but it raises the question: why did the anonymous writer in the Guardian make this wild and whacky statement which is clearly not true? Arsenal’s advantage this season (which is obvious if one looks at it, is that they create goals out of little chances, or indeed out of nothing at all, using Saka and Smith Rowe (our two top scorers to achieve this) to achieve this.
If the Guardian had wished to be accurate they could have said “Arsenal’s problem is that they do not create enough big chances and so have achieved miracles by being the fifth in the league while being 16th in the “big chances” league. But they don’t say that. Either because they couldn’t be arsed to do the research or because they want to mislead us.
Here’s the table.
|Rank||Club||Big Chances||Goals||Percentage converted|
|6.||West Ham United||48||51||106%|
|9.||Brighton and Hove Albion||39||28||72%|
As we can see, there is a propensity for clubs who score fewer goals to get them from converting big chances but by other means. So maybe we do need roaming centre forward after all!
- Arsenal and Southampton injuries; the strange case of the keeper and Southampton’s record
- Southampton v Arsenal: how the refs treat each team, how the managers have done
- Arsenal v Tottenham update, team news and appalling, flagrant media bias
- Arsenal have benefitted by the world cup break: allegedly.
- Arsenal and Tottenham: which has had the easier ride so far this season?
- Arsenal v Tottenham: not exactly a battle of equals.
- Death by 300,000 passes: how the Arsenal transformation started 2 seasons ago.