Welcome to the world of unmitigated anti-Arsenal bias in the media



By Tony Attwood

There is a football quiz in the Guardian newspaper today which begins “It’s been nearly six weeks since the top flight shut down for the World Cup. How much do you remember?”

Which seems fair enough – a light-hearted way back into the football.   And given that “the top flight” is mentioned one might expect a certain amount of engagement with Arsenal in the questions and answers what with Arsenal being top of the pile by five points at the moment having played one game fewer than the clubs in third and fourth.

Manchester City come up four times in the questions and answers.  Even Tottenham whose last trophy was the league cup some fifteen years ago come up a couple times   Liverpool turn up three times and they are just sixth in the league at the moment.

But no.  Arsenal, five points clear, get mentioned just the once in the quiz via the question “Which three teams have picked up more than one red card so far this season?”

To help the Guardian reader along, three possible answers are given, one of which is “Chelsea, Leeds and Wolves.  Wolverhampton are in fact the worst offenders in the league with three; Chelsea and Leeds have had two players each sent off.”   

Arsenal have had one.  And while we are at it, Aston Villa and Manchester United have each had 37 yellow cards this season.  If we draw up a yellow card table Arsenal are 14th with 23.

But not including Arsenal in the quiz except as a false answer in terms of the ill discipline is the sort of low-level negativity against Arsenal which is a media constant.   

Here’s another from Guardian, also on their website today: “Arteta urges club to be “active” and strengthen in transfer window”

The story runs, “Mikel Arteta believes Arsenal cannot afford to waste the January transfer window that follows the Premier League’s restart.”

Note the phrase “cannot afford to waste” – suggesting that is what they might do – that the board, or perhaps Arteta’s fellow director Edu will do just that.   And yet there is nothing in the article to suggest that Arteta has said that or anything like that.    What he is actually quoted as saying is, “We are going to be active and active means we are looking to strengthen the team.”     So “active” does not necessarily mean buying in new players” but “looking”.   And this is confirmed with a subsequent statement, “We’ll be extremely cautious about what we want to do in the window.”

Which all things considered is rather different.

Of course there are the occasional positives around, as with the story in the Express that tells us that in Martinelli Arsenal have the new Marc Overmars.  Overmars played 100 times for Arsenal and scored 25 goals.  Martinelli has played 17 times and scored five – which is actually a 29% scoring rate, so a little above Overmars’ rate of 25%.

But to come back to our opening point, top of the tree this season is Odegaard who has scored in 40% of his appearances on average.  Gabriel Jesus’ rate is 31.25%, so in point of fact Arsenal have not actually lost their top striker to injury.   Of course Jesus is an incredibly important player in the team but the media’s fixation with Arsenal needing to buy a new goalscorer is misplaced.

Manchester City are of course a special case, and no one has suggested that in one season Arsenal are going to move up from fifth last season to overtaking Manchester City on every front.   But let’s look at the club in third position in the league, Newcastle, in comparison with Arsenal.


Sqd Player Starts Subs Goals Pens
24 Miguel Almirón 16 1 8
9 Callum Wilson 11 1 6 1
39 Bruno Guimarães 13 2 3
14 Alexander Isak 3 0 2 1
28 Joe Willock 15 3 2
20 Chris Wood 4 13 2


Now Arsenal… (figures from 11v11)


Sqd Player starts Subs Goals Pens
8 Martin Odegaard 15 4 6
9 Gabriel Jesus 16 4 5
11 Gabriel Martinelli 17 3 5
7 Bukayo Saka 16 4 5 1
34 Granit Xhaka 18 2 4
14 Eddie Nketiah 7 12 3
21 Fábio Vieira 8 7 2
6 Gabriel 18 2 2
24 Reiss Nelson 3 4 2
5 Thomas Partey 11 4 2
12 William Saliba 17 0 2


Newcastle have six players who have scored two or more in the Premier League this season – Arsenal have 11.  If we count from three goals up we have six players in that group, they have three.

The point is Arsenal are scoring more goals from a wide range of players, but the media has conspired to tell the story that Arsenal are losing their top scorer and so everything is over unless the club spends a fortune on a new centre forward.  We’re not – Odegaard is still in the team.

True we don’t have a player in the top ten goal scorers in the league this season (Odegaard is 11th) but having one man who gets most of the goals is dangerous if he gets injured.  Kane has scored 39% of all Tottenham’s league goals this season.  What happens to them if he gets injured?

5 Replies to “Welcome to the world of unmitigated anti-Arsenal bias in the media”

  1. All the media experts including ex players who criticise Nketiah and forecast a probable decline in results without Jesus would do well to read this excellent analysis by Opta analyst. Their in depth stat and fact based comparison between the two strikers reveals a far different picture than that painted by the sheep like so called expert pundits who basically do not have a clue what they are talking about. Experts my back side.
    You can read the article here…


  2. Tony,

    I was reading the guardian online this morning and had the same reaction : the picture shows a few people from then PL, and from it I would imagine City is on top… no Arsenal logo/shirt/payer in sight.

    Interestingly, in Germany, Sky are running aa advert/trailer about the ‘Christmas season’ in the PL of which our own Oodegard is the main character…,aybe they have not understood Arsenal are not a PL team ?!?!

    Apart from that, maybe all have accepted that there is Arsenal on top and thst won’t change and the only interesting subject is how the bottom part (seen from N1 1 sopt) will handle the rest of the season.

    Deadwood journalists, that is all they are….

    Funny, by the way, to se no one is stepping up to defend Harry Kane who got the 3 Lions booted out of the World Cup. Why ? Guess he did not get the shitstorm Saka got the last time he missed a penalty… That would be a subject to address, would it not ?

  3. mick shelly

    “Their in depth stat and fact based comparison between the two strikers reveals a far different picture than that painted by the sheep”

    You don’t have to go there mick I’ve been saying this and posting statistics to back it up on here for a month. I’ve done comparisons between Nketiah and Jesus, Martinelli and Saka. There’s even a big piece in the preceding article.

    Have you not seen any of it?


    Kane plays for Spurs, Saka plays for Arsenal, it’s as simple as that.

  4. I feel so vindicated by that analysis.

    I’ve been banging this drum for a month and not had a single word of support from any of you guys. All I’ve been told is ‘He’s not good good enough’ or ‘You can make statistics say what ever you want’.

    I don’t have a tenth of the resources OPTA have and yet by research and investigation I reached the same conclusion.

    Of course, none of this undermines Jesus or even says we WILL just sail on serenely with Nketiah in his stead, it just suggests we could, because as I keep saying, in the shape of Nketiah we have a little gem.

  5. Tony

    The Sun continues in a similar Vein today. Out of 8 pages of sport devoted to football we have:

    George Cohen – 2 Page spread, of course absolutely appropriate

    Man City – 1 page
    Man Utd – Almost full page
    Newcastle – Almost full page
    A. villa – Almost full page

    Chesea – Over half a page
    Spurs – Over half a page

    Infantino – Over half a page

    Others with more column inches than Arsenal were:

    Leicester City

    And this is the London edition of the Sun.

    Arsenal, who lets not forget lead the table by 5 points after being tipped to finish out of the top 4, get 2/3rds of one column and even then the entire piece is Arteta talking about how wonderful David Moyes is! So in reality even those meagre column inches are not about Arsenal Per Se.

    I know it’s all a bit something and nothing, but it does underline Tony’s point.

    Can you imagine how it would be if the Tiny Totts were 5 points clear?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *