REFEREE LEAGUE TABLES 2012 – The competencey of the refs Part 2

—————–

 Ordinary is Pointless

—————————————————

This article is part of the series : REFEREE REVIEW 2012

—————————————————-

By DogFace and Walter Broeckx

Untold Arsenal has a team of qualified referees who have reviewed more than 40% of the EPL games from last season. The reviews themselves were based on full match video footage with the advantage of video technology features such as slow motion and pause.

By reviewing those 155 games we have made a database of more than 7000 decisions that have been judged by our panel of dedicated and qualified referees.

The numbers you will see are based on those decisions and those reviewed games.

In this summary of all the team reviews we will take a look at some of  the different decisions.

I would like to stress that the numbers we show in this article are just based on the decisions from the refs. This is not about which teams got the decisions. The numbers are based on the decisions from the refs in the games of said teams.

Of course for any team it is better to end up with a high score of correct decisions. After all name me one football supporter who wants to see referees making mistakes and screwing up games?

So in a way it is of course good to have a high % score of correct decisions.

In this article we will focus on the “other” decisions, the offside decisions and the yellow card decisions. The other decisions and offside decisions are weighted with 1 point in our reviews. The yellow cards were weighted with 2 points.

“OTHER” DECISIONS

The “other decisions” are the decisions that are being made “in the middle of the field”. It is all little fouls, pushes, trips, shoves, handballs, dangerous play, …. in short all the fouls that happen somewhere on the field outside the penalty area.

To clarify a few things first about this type of decisions. When we could not judge the decision because of lack of images or replays we gave the decision to the ref as a correct one.  Because we always did it like that in case of doubt: we gave the decision to the ref.

	Correct decisions	other	+/- Average
1	SWANSEA	81,340	9,380
2	ASTON VILLA	78,472	6,512
3	WIGAN	76,446	4,486
4	BLACKBURN	76,364	4,404
5	LIVERPOOL	75,826	3,866
6	MAN C	75,054	3,094
7	WBA	75,000	3,040
8	BOLTON	74,254	2,294
9	CHELSEA	73,611	1,651
10	MAN U	72,619	0,659
11	TOTTENHAM	72,285	0,325
12	SUNDERLAND	71,991	0,031
13	NORWICH	71,096	-0,864
14	EVERTON	70,419	-1,541
15	WOLVES	68,844	-3,116
16	NEWCASTLE	67,611	-4,349
17	QPR	67,557	-4,403
18	ARSENAL	67,412	-4,548
19	FULHAM	65,909	-6,051
20	STOKE	65,447	-6,513

So we see that Swansea is the team where the refs made the most correct decisions about fouls in the middle of the field. This is fouls for and against both teams on the field when Swansea was one of the teams playing.  So Swansea fans have not only been blessed with some excellent football the way it is played by the best players, with the ball on the ground and with a fluent passing game. They also have been blessed with referees who have done their best to do their games as good as possible.

Swansea is the ONLY TEAM in the league that has seen a correct decision % of more than 80%. I think this is the standard that should be the minimum for the referees in the PL. Our numbers show it can be done. So why don’t they keep that level of performance for other teams?

In total 12 teams have had the honour of having a correct decisions percentage of more than 70%. On paper that is enough in most countries. But that means that 8 teams didn’t get that score in their games! How can you say that the referees in the PL are good enough when 40% of the teams do net receive the strict minimum that is required?

All 20 teams should have a correct decisions % above 70%. And as long as this is not happening the PGMOL and the referees are not good enough. There is no other way but to put it that way.

As this is an Arsenal blog I point at the fact that Arsenal is in 18th place in this table. So very low near the bottom of the table. Bottom of the table is Stoke City.  They have seen the most awful refereeing in the league.  And that is without even thinking about their style of football.

OFFSIDE DECISIONS

The next table we will show is the offside decisions. To clarify a few things first about this type of decisions. When we could not judge the decision because of lack of images or replays we gave the decision to the ref as a correct one.  Because we always did it like that in case of doubt: we gave the decision to the ref.

	Correct decisions	offside	+/- Average
1	TOTTENHAM	95,192	4,993
2	NEWCASTLE	95,050	4,851
3	QPR	94,118	3,919
4	BOLTON	93,878	3,679
5	ASTON VILLA	93,333	3,134
6	LIVERPOOL	93,182	2,983
7	BLACKBURN	91,667	1,468
8	ARSENAL	90,698	0,499
9	SWANSEA	90,625	0,426
10	NORWICH	90,164	-0,035
11	WOLVES	89,474	-0,725
12	FULHAM	89,474	-0,725
13	WBA	88,889	-1,310
14	MAN U	88,889	-1,310
15	EVERTON	88,636	-1,563
16	MAN C	88,550	-1,649
17	CHELSEA	87,342	-2,857
18	STOKE	87,179	-3,020
19	SUNDERLAND	85,185	-5,014
20	WIGAN	78,378	-11,821

This season the head of the PGMOL came out with some numbers, telling us that 99% of the offside decisions were correct. Just take a look at this league table then. Our average was just over 90% and as been said we gave the benefit of the doubt to the ref very easy.

Not one team came close to the claimed 99% score from Mike Riley. The closest was Tottenham Hotspur with 95% and Newcastle also got above the 95% mark. 9 teams got a score above our league average score. And 10 teams got a score of over 90% in total. The other 10 teams are below the 90% mark. With even Wigan only getting a score of 78%.

How on earth can we take Mike 99% Riley seriously after this?  If he wouldn’t have claimed that 99% we could say about the offside decisions: oh, well this will be the highest possible score that can be made on this. But after Mike 99 raising the bar and expectations to this height he is the one to blame for our disappointment about this score.

As this is an Arsenal blog I gladly point at the fact that Arsenal is in 8th place in this league table. And Arsenal is one of the “lucky” teams that has a score that is higher than the league average.

Yellow Card decisions

The next type of decisions is the first that has a weight on it: the yellow card decisions league table. We came up with a league average of 62,24% correct decisions on yellow cards. An already devastating low number. Let us see how the different teams fared.

 

	Correct decisions	yellow	+/- Average
1	ASTON VILLA	68,966	12,677
2	NEWCASTLE	68,235	11,946
3	SWANSEA	64,286	7,997
4	BLACKBURN	62,222	5,933
5	ARSENAL	59,361	3,072
6	EVERTON	58,730	2,441
7	STOKE	57,576	1,287
8	CHELSEA	57,447	1,158
9	MAN C	57,051	0,762
10	WIGAN	56,757	0,468
11	TOTTENHAM	56,637	0,348
12	SUNDERLAND	55,172	-1,117
13	WBA	53,571	-2,718
14	MAN U	53,165	-3,124
15	LIVERPOOL	53,097	-3,192
16	QPR	50,000	-6,289
17	FULHAM	49,020	-7,269
18	NORWICH	48,889	-7,400
19	BOLTON	47,368	-8,921
20	WOLVES	38,636	-17,653

The team with the best score is Aston Villa. But even in their games the 70% score was not reached. So all in all this really is a disappointing result. But in all this worse decisions making Aston Villa had the privilege of seeing the best of the worst one could say.

11 teams got a score above the league average. Meaning we also got 9 teams with a lower score than the league average. And in the games when Wolverhampton was around it was just terrible. This must be the most miserable number of them all. More than 17% below the already unacceptable league average.

I don’t know how to describe this. This is so disappointing.

And if I can shine a little light in this total darkness and as this is an Arsenal blog I like to point at the score of the games in which Arsenal played a part.  Arsenal finished in 5th place in this league table. So in the Arsenal games we can say that only 4 decisions in 10 were wrong when yellow cards had to be given or not of course.

In the next article we will move on to the most important decisions: red cards, penalties and goals.

——————

• What happens when the manager leaves? (Or Redknapp – more of a menace outside than in?)
• How we moved to Highbury – for the first time ever, a complete chronology
• One managerial change a month for the last 16 years – and Arsène Wenger is still there
• Opting out of Arsenal.  What happens when a player wants to break his contract
• Measuring the competence of the referees
• Football as a series of cock-ups
• Are we biased because Arsenal figures are included in the ref analyses
• Ref bias: Looking for an independent second sources to confirm our findings
• As Man U’s sponsorship deal unravels, we wonder what’s going on