Ref on the day was Martin Atkinson
Well that was a match with lots of big decisions. And not really the +98% score the PGMO tells us that referees get in general.
In the first half the ref awarded a penalty for a clear foul on Alexis. It proved to be his only correct penalty decision in the match. Later more on that.
A bit later Onuoha held Welbeck in a warm embrace that outside the football field could be seen as a love dance. Onuoha was like a warm coat hanging over Welbeck on a cold day. Not really allowed within the laws of the game. Should have been a penalty for Arsenal. 1 not given in favour of Arsenal. Remember the count.
But that was the only real big mistake from the ref in the first half. Leaving him with a good first half score of 87% and if we put weight on it this drops to 82%. If we only look at the important decisions the score was 75%.
On to the second half. The first big talking point was the red card for Giroud. Let it be clear Giroud was fouled by Onuoha but that should be no excuse to go to another player in an aaggressive way and then move your head in the direction of his head. For those asking the difference between Wilshere and Giroud was that in the Wilshere case it was Wilshere who was being assaulted by Fellaini in the first place.
But Ref Atkinson let the foul on Giroud go and that could have lead to a serious injury as because of the push he almost collided with Green who luckily could avoid the frontal impact. But Giroud could have ended up with his head against the knee of Green, it was close. But to send Giroud off was correct.
But what Ferdinand did was also an act of aggression when he pinched Giroud in the neck from behind. He should have been sent off for this also.
Next we move on to the penalty decisions. Fer kicks Per from behind in the penalty area when Per is first on the ball. A clear penalty but the ref ignores it completely. Second penalty not given in favour of Arsenal.
To add insult to this decision two minutes later he gives a non-penalty in favour of QPR when Debuchy clearly kicks the ball away. Hoillet goes down but Debuchy cannot cut off his foot after having played the ball so this cannot be considered a deliberate foul. But the ref gives it and brings QPR back in the match.
So that is three wrong penalty decisions against Arsenal.
And then we come to the last minute. Gibbs dives in and Zamora goes down. Both players miss the ball but for me and on the replays I have seen, a penalty should have been given. For those who see this as evidence that the ref was in favour of Arsenal might look back at the first three wrong penalty decisions against Arsenal. I wonder if the ref hadn’t given that wrong penalty and he knew very well that it was a wrong decision that he would have given the second.
But he didn’t and otherwise that would have been very hard on Arsenal as the final wrong penalty decisions is three wrong going against Arsenal and 1 wrong going against QPR.
The score in the second half for the ref was 71% and if we put weight on it we see a score of 62%. The score of the important decisions was 50%.
Over the whole 90 minutes we get a score of 78%. And if we put weight on the decision he ends up with a score of 70%. Looking only at the important decisions his score is 56%.
The bias numbers. 8 wrong decisions and 7 of them against Arsenal. A bias score of 87% against Arsenal. So the big teams certainly at home get the big calls they say? Not really in this match.
98.4% of all referee decisions are correct – the the press believe them
It takes Arsenal 4.6 fouls to get a card.
Want to make a comment? Have a look at the rules.
- Congratulations Arsene: welcome to the hall of fame
- How will the final league table look? Our laptop computer reports
- If Arsenal go on like this, what will the final table look like?
- Only a handful of teams can win the league: but nothing has changed.
- The set of predictions that tell us exactly how the final table will look
12 Replies to “Untold Ref Review: Arsenal – QPR”
Walter, Not sure about the goals in the second half, you have a correct goal for Arsenal in Min64, but haven’t noted an incorrect one – presumably it was the QPR penalty in Min77.
I did take it in to account in the totals but the detail line has gone missing somehow?
You sound really unbiased, mate, these are you opinions and are subjective, so how on earth can you present data based on subjective views.
Another so-called top referee making six wrong important decisions (second yellow cards, red cards, penalties or goals) in one match. Do the PGMO still stand by their statistics of decisions being 98% correct – yes. Do we believe them – HELL NO.
So it’s Dean for Sunday
That Riley is a witch, sending dean again? Starting to look as if all he lives for is to screw Arsenal. Bastard.
Another detailed report which yet again shows the gross incompetence and bias exhibited by the PGMO.
I would like to see Webb try to get 98% correct decisions out of this match!!
Is Gallagher the apologist still around? I have not noted much evidence of him lately.
I see we have dancing Dean for Sunday, lets hope the scumbag pulls a hamstring in the warm up!
A hamstring is far too mild for him, I have had a tooth out today – I wish him an infected one.
We all know he will try and screw us, the art is in trying to guess how. 53% overall in his only Arsenal game so far this year with decision bias 80/20 against – surprisingly one of the lower bias scores!
Off topic: Taylor this weekend once again proving what Untold has been saying about him all these years: rubbish. Total rubbish. And he gets a Fifa badge… wonder why??
Walter – sometimes one forgets the people behind the badge & respect FIFA. This is the organisation whose match officials are led by Busacca! So any badge now is corrupted by the filth that runs football. Taylor is not being promoted by the FIFA badge just being classified as inept & incapable of fairness.
Amazing article, albeit dated, on the irregularities in Premier League.
Unsurprisingly, not something you would read in an English press.
Comments are closed.