By Tony Attwood
Let’s ask a simple question. If everything was straight and above board in Qatar, why have secrecy? If there is nothing amiss why not open up every aspect of Qatarian society, and the organisation of the world cup? If everything is running in a way that we would all immediately approve of, why threaten to sue a small Norwegian publisher? If the UK media were not under threat of intimidation, why would they not mention any of this, even if the resultant article were to say “we’ve looked at the allegations and they are all false.”
Not mentioning anything can only enhance suspicion that those of the UK’s football teams that qualify for the world cup final will be playing in stadia built by slave labour.
Of course, I have to be clear – Untold Arsenal doesn’t have any evidence. We don’t have a team of spies or agents in Qatar sifting through data, picking up stories. What we do is read other sources which keep on mentioning this issue of slave labour. And now we find that the Norwegian publication “Josimar”, having published an article at the end of October that critically focused on Qatar’s World Cup stadium programme has been threatened with legal action.
The article was about the legal case against an employee of Qatar’s World Cup Supreme Committee, who had spoken out against the actions of management in a legal case concerning unpaid migrant workers.
The employee in question worked in the communications department and was reportedly given five years in prison, and in the article Josimar backed up the suspicion of an unfair trial with an audio recording in which the head and public face of the Supreme Committee Hassan Al-Thawadi engages directly in the discussion.
Human Rights Watch is among the organisations that has reviewed the issues of freedom of speech – and if you are interested, that link is worth following through. And now the Supreme Committee, through its lawyers has threatened to sue Josimar over its reporting. The Qatar claim is on the grounds that the use of the audio recordings is a violation of privacy.
However one of the leading arguments from various western countries for engaging in the 2022 World Cup finals is that holding the finals in Qatar is helping to create change, by forcing Qatar to adopt western standards of employment and human rights.
Indeed there have been a number of statements floating around to the effect that the legislation regulating the conditions of migrant workers in Qatar has been significantly improved and that the state is opening up. Which again makes it odd that in such circumstances the state should take a backward step and start threatening legal action against a magazine that publishes a story it doesn’t like.
Head of the Supreme Committee, Hassan Al-Thawadi is alleged to have wanted the communications department to show that there was no relationship between the 2022 World Cup and migrant workers’ demonstrations in 2019, where the workers first made the point that they were not being paid properly.
Now in threatening to sue Josimar the Supreme Committee is reinforcing the suggestion that in Qatar freedom of speech is not only not welcomed but also not valued.
What this suggests is that when the big boys of the media arrive in Qatar to cover the world cup, they too are going to be censored in terms of what they say – although of course they won’t have been around to watch the building of the stadia, nor to witness the alleged treatment of migrant workers.
So we come back to the basics. Obviously, Untold Arsenal doesn’t have any evidence in this case. But looking on from the outside, Qatar at present lacks a certain amount of credibility when these accusations are made. It has the choice – be open and show the world how the stadia were built and enable the world’s media to interview the migrant workers about wages, conditions etc – or be closed and start threatening to sue small publications.
Interestingly, the Independent online newspaper, allegedly deleted its own critical article about the jailed former communications worker. Now if that were so, why would they do that? One possible reason would be (and of course I have no evidence, I am only speculating) that the Independent has either been threatened with a libel action, funded by the state, or has been told that its journalists won’t get to enjoy the giant freebie that the world cup finals normally are.
I can be quite clear – I have no idea what is going on here, apart from the fact that a small publication has made these allegations which various mainstream charities have been making for some time. You may choose to dismiss them, or you may wonder why the mainstream media has gone so quiet on the stories of the exploitation of migrant workers in Qatar.
And you may also ask, does it matter if our nation supports this event, arguing perhaps there is nothing much we can do about it either way.
If so you can rest happy in the knowledge that I don’t have any evidence – just a story from an obscure Norwegian publication and reports from a few British charities. Or you might just remember one or two of the other activities Fifa have been involved in and which is still engaging them in the Swiss courts. If the stories are true, at least we can say that the FA, Fifa and Qatar thoroughly deserve each other and should get on famously.
The slavery files & the FA
- Qatar and the world cup – the protests grow
- Odegaard speaks out against world cup in Qatar; a country built on slavery
- Human rights abuses: has our little campaign had unexpected support?
- MP stance on football should fill us all with disgust
- If all lives matter, if slavery is unacceptable, what is the FA doing about Qatar?
- British media universally continues to support modern slavery
- Is Tottenham part of this world? The club seeks urgent clarification.
- Congratulations Arsene: welcome to the hall of fame
- How will the final league table look? Our laptop computer reports
- If Arsenal go on like this, what will the final table look like?
- Only a handful of teams can win the league: but nothing has changed.
3 Replies to “Small publication threatened by Qatar World Cup Committee over slavery allegations”
Ever since Qatar won the bid to hold the 2022 World cup finals there has been a constant stream of reports in all types of media about how the bid was won how they managed to hold on to it even though it became apparent they could not fulfil the promised plan for a summer World Cup and more recently the stories of migrant mistreatment… The whole sorry story smacks of hypocrisy, secret meetings, money changing hands and objections brushed away if the media can’t speak out or won’t speak out then the fans in this country should… They may be able to threaten the media but they can’t quiten the mass supporters who they need to watch it… Why can’t we start a partiton up to boycot the finals both as fans and as supporters of human rights. at this time of racial equality surly the mistreatment of workers falls into the area football is trying to rid itself of. we in this country have the infostructure in place to hold a compation at short notice… Start a partition for boycotting the finals and holding a competion ourself for any countries wishing to join us… Let the fans make there own minds up if there is strong support in it then the Fa will have to listen in the same way as the British teams supporters started a backlash against the super league.
A, not completely unrelated comment, sprang out at me in the ITV commentary in the England game yesterday. When it was announced that the crowd was 80,000, the commentator made a statement to the effect of, “yet another success for which the FA can take credit”!
Despite the fact that the FA had nothing whatsoever with how many people turned up to the game, “another success”?!! Name the others!
Failure to deal with child abuse; failure to win a world cup bid when they spent an absolute fortune and implied it was in the bag; supporting FIFA through thick and thin despite their ‘questionable’ dealings; allowing the PGMO to run a secret society; not allowing anybody to know what happens with the money from the Community Shield; having permission to call it the Charity Shield withdrawn by the Charity Commission because of their own failings???
There are just too many successes to mention! What bugs me most is that the mainstream media perpetuate this, there’s-nothing-to-see-here bullshit.
I had exactly the same thoughts listening to the ITV commentary. A few months ago, many journalists and a few bloggers were saying that Mr Matterface would be an upgrade on Mr. Tyldesley. On the face of it, that should have been a near-certainty. It seems that they were incorrect as usual.
Back on topic, I won’t be holding my breath while waiting for the BBC to cover this story. Neither do I expect FIFA nor the FA to act on Mr Ibhais’ emails.
Comments are closed.