- Wolverhampton v Arsenal; and the team that gives Southampton hope
- An interview on Radio 5 about “North London Forever”
By Bulldog Drummond
You may recall that in the last league match we were able to predict the result of a draw simply by noting the fact that the referee on that day did not do home wins.
And you might recall how we got rather agitated when we found that the referee for the last Arsenal match – played as you will recall, at home – was a referee who virtually never oversees home wins. Indeed, so it turned out to be, although not for the first time we have had little inklings that PGMO are reading (if not actually taking any notice of) Untold.
But we don’t want to go back over that so instead let us consider Arsenal being away from home and the match being overseen by Michael Oliver. (And if you are reading us in PGMO Towers, hello from the real world.)
So what sort of results does Michael Oliver oversee? To answer that, here is a comparison of his game results with other referees this season.
Last season Oliver oversaw an equal number of home and away wins. This has however now changed for this season where away wins are now more common. In the table below the figures are all for this season except the one row where we take Oliver’s from last season to compare with this
Referee | Games | HomeWin% | AwayWin% | Draw% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anthony Taylor | 20 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 25.0 |
Samuel Barrott | 14 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 7.1 |
Stuart Attwell | 12 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 |
Michael Oliver 2024/25 | 16 | 25.0 | 43.8 | 31.3 |
Micahel Oliver 2023/24 | 24 | 41.7 | 41.7 | 16.7 |
Andy Madley | 10 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 20.0 |
Peter Bankes | 13 | 61.5 | 38.5 | 0.0 |
Simon Hooper | 14 | 42.9 | 35.7 | 21.4 |
Tony Harrington | 12 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 16.7 |
Craig Pawson | 13 | 46.2 | 30.8 | 23.1 |
Chris Kavanagh | 15 | 6.7 | 20.0 | 73.3 |
Now of course, not every percentage point that shifts a referee in the table is down to a deliberate decision by the referee, but the trends are noticeable and indeed noteworthy. And what we can say, is that today we have a referee who is willing and able to contemplate the concept of the away win. And that brings a huge sigh of relief after what we had in the last game (ie a referee who could not contemplate a home win).
Now in the issue of Wolverhampton v Arsenal we have found a very curious statistic. Wolverhampton average 14.2 shots per game, against Arsenal’s 10.5. But Arsenal have scored 43 goals to Wolverhampton’s 32. So Arsenal score roughly once every four shotss, while Wolverhampton score one every 2.25 shots. The key thing as I am sure every other team in the league knows, is just to keep Wolverhampton away from shooting at close range and force them to shoot from distance.. That is what teams do, and game after game Wolverhampton fall into the trap. It must be quite tedious watching them as a home fan.
So Wolverhampton put in 35% more shots than Arsenal, and 28% more tackles than Arsenal. And yet they only get 12% more fouls given against them than Arsenal, which clearly shows that either Wolverhampton are the master tacklers, or referees are being lenient toward them. Since we have seen this before with teams low in the league, the answer is clear. Not every team is refereed in the same way.
They put in 1.64 tackles before they get a foul, while Arsenal put in 1.43 tackles before getting a foul. That looks odd and it is. Clearly, their defenders are not better at defending than Arsenal’s, since Wolverhampton have left in 51 goals to Arsenal’s 21. It is simply that the worse a team is at defending the more fouls the referees let them get away with. Their excuse is that they are making the game more watchable, but they are also failing to apply the rules of the game fairly and equally.
Clearly, if Wolverhampton really were the master tacklers they would not be conceding quite so many goals, but when we look at it we find that they have conceded more goals than anyone else (51 this season). Indeed more even than Southampton, Ipswich and Leicester City, and it is possible that one of those teams will overtake Wolverhampton and send them back to the Championship.
Finally for now we have a spot of transfer news: Kieran Tierney rejects Bayer Leverkusen, Juventus and Sevilla to agree Celtic return. That is from the Telegraph.
Hey guys. I know I pointed out that you made a bad error on the stats but I’ve been supporting this site for many years…why delete my post pointing out your error? I was in no way offensive and was actually apologetic. Very bad form!!
I have no record of receiving such a comment from you. But as you can see with your comments posted at 23.20 and 23.26, they go straight up, and I certainly wasn’t on the site checking incoming emails at that time. I was (as 100 or so other poeple will attest) at an event in Rugby.
@ Tony
I clicked on the ‘Post Comment’ button and saw my comment posted. I apologise if you did not deliberately remove the comment but it was definitely up there….temporarily at least.
I’m not going to re-write it all but your stats are wrong and your calculations are wrong.
The shots you have quoted are those each team has conceded this season not those taken. Further your calculations are wrong in that if Wolves had had 14.2 shots per game before yesterday that would have meant they had had 312 shots. You then state that they score a goal every 2.25 shots which would mean they had scored 139 goals already this season, which they clearly haven’t!