by Walter Broeckx
In our series to find out with which ref some teams perform better than average we have referee Lee Probert next.
But first let me explain in short the average, under and over thing you see in the last row of the table below. This is for new readers of course. Regular readers can skip this text and go to the table.
When you see “average” it means that the results of the team in general are not that far away with the results when the ref is in charge. It is in fact what one should hope to see most.
When we see “over” it means that the team in question is doing much better and in some cases much much better than they usual do.
And when you see “under” it means that the team is doing bad compared to their usual win percentage.
So let us see the results of the teams under referee Probert
Total | won | draw | lost | won | draw | lost | Achieving | |
Arsenal |
797 |
426 |
212 |
159 |
53,45% |
26,60% |
19,95% |
|
Probert |
8 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
25,00% |
37,50% |
37,50% |
Under |
Aston Villa |
797 |
287 |
249 |
261 |
36,01% |
31,24% |
32,75% |
|
Probert |
16 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
43,75% |
37,50% |
18,75% |
Average |
Chelsea |
797 |
414 |
206 |
177 |
51,94% |
25,85% |
22,21% |
|
Probert |
9 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
77,78% |
11,11% |
11,11% |
Over |
Everton |
797 |
282 |
230 |
285 |
35,38% |
28,86% |
35,76% |
|
Probert |
15 |
8 |
5 |
2 |
53,33% |
33,33% |
13,33% |
Over |
Fulham |
443 |
137 |
128 |
178 |
30,93% |
28,89% |
40,18% |
|
Probert |
11 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
36,36% |
18,18% |
45,45% |
Average |
Liverpool |
797 |
389 |
203 |
205 |
48,81% |
25,47% |
25,72% |
|
Probert |
13 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
69,23% |
0,00% |
30,77% |
Over |
Man City |
607 |
226 |
159 |
222 |
37,23% |
26,19% |
36,57% |
|
Probert |
12 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
66,67% |
16,67% |
16,67% |
Over |
MU |
797 |
520 |
165 |
112 |
65,24% |
20,70% |
14,05% |
|
Probert |
8 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
87,50% |
12,50% |
0,00% |
Over |
Newcastle |
717 |
284 |
192 |
241 |
39,61% |
26,78% |
33,61% |
|
Probert |
8 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
12,50% |
50,00% |
37,50% |
Under |
Norwich |
227 |
68 |
72 |
87 |
29,96% |
31,72% |
38,33% |
|
Probert |
12 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
50,00% |
16,67% |
33,33% |
Over |
QPR |
227 |
71 |
57 |
99 |
31,28% |
25,11% |
43,61% |
|
Probert |
12 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
33,33% |
25,00% |
41,67% |
Average |
Reading |
101 |
31 |
21 |
49 |
30,69% |
20,79% |
48,51% |
|
Probert |
9 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
22,22% |
22,22% |
55,56% |
Under |
Southampton |
531 |
155 |
146 |
230 |
29,19% |
27,50% |
43,31% |
|
Probert |
10 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
50,00% |
20,00% |
30,00% |
Over |
Stoke |
177 |
53 |
54 |
70 |
29,94% |
30,51% |
39,55% |
|
Probert |
19 |
11 |
1 |
7 |
57,89% |
5,26% |
36,84% |
Over |
Sunderland |
443 |
119 |
112 |
212 |
26,86% |
25,28% |
47,86% |
|
Probert |
13 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
30,77% |
23,08% |
46,15% |
Average |
Swansea |
63 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
31,75% |
33,33% |
34,92% |
|
Probert |
12 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
58,33% |
25,00% |
16,67% |
Over |
Tottenham |
797 |
307 |
210 |
280 |
38,52% |
26,35% |
35,13% |
|
Probert |
14 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
21,43% |
35,71% |
42,86% |
Under |
WBA |
253 |
62 |
64 |
127 |
24,51% |
25,30% |
50,20% |
|
Probert |
14 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
35,71% |
14,29% |
50,00% |
Over |
West Ham |
641 |
210 |
164 |
267 |
32,76% |
25,59% |
41,65% |
|
Probert |
11 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
36,36% |
9,09% |
54,55% |
Average |
Wigan |
291 |
81 |
73 |
137 |
27,84% |
25,09% |
47,08% |
|
Probert |
17 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
11,76% |
17,65% |
70,59% |
Under |
First remark is that Probert can do all the teams. He should have no special relation with any team.
Let us take a look at the teams who do better than usual when he is around. Chelsea, Everton, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, Norwich, Southampton, Stoke, Swansea and WBA are the lucky teams when he is refereeing. That is 10 teams of the 20 who do better and in some cases much much better than their average win % might expect them to do. Manchester United is yet to lose a game when Probert is around.
Let us move on to the teams who do rather averagely when he is around. Aston Villa, Fulham, QPR, Sunderland and West Ham are the teams who have almost the same win % with or without Probert on the field. That are 5 teams.
And who are the teams that should fear the day they see his name appointed to one of their games? Arsenal supporters who follow us a bit and who follow the refs will not be surprised to see that Arsenal is amongst the teams who do bad when he is in charge. Other teams are Newcastle, Reading, Tottenham and Wigan. He somehow doesn’t seem to like North London teams this ref.
His record for Arsenal is compared to their overall league win % the worst of them all. He has had history with Wenger in the past (MU) he has made ridiculous decisions against Arsenal (Wigan, Fulham,….). Against WBA he didn’t let Vermaelen on the field for many minutes when Mertesacker was sent off and the way he was enjoying the anger of Bould and Wenger when Bould gave his opinion about it showed how he enjoyed making the Arsenal training staff angry.
Statistically speaking ref Probert is a walking disaster for Arsenal. We know Dean better as we see him more but believe me Probert is as bad if not even worse than Dean for Arsenal.
I really would like to know why he hates Wenger that much as I do think it is something personal after Wenger kicking a water bottle at Old Trafford and Probert trying to send him to the stand and the scenes with Wenger standing there at the top of a part of Old Trafford in some kind of Jesus Christ impersonation with his hands wide open, asking Probert: why are you crucifying me?
Later on everyone agreed that the reaction of Probert to have send Wenger sent off was over the top and the PGMOL had to apologise in name of the ref and the 4th official on that day. To complete the story: the ref was Dean and the 4th official was as said before ref Probert. I wonder how much is still playing a part when he is around an Arsenal game? If so I think the PGMOL should take action and remove him from Arsenal games.
Recent posts
- The collusion between the media and football clubs is neither healthy for the media, nor football.
- PGMOL is breaking its own rules by appointing Dean. Do we smell the stench of calciopoli?
- A devilish story from the unknown master of devils stories: Stephen Queen
- What’s wrong with PL refs: a case study. Oliver
———————————
The most detailed study of Premier League Refs ever:The referees 2013.
He’s obviously biased against Arsenal, and that makes him a man that can be relied on in pgmol’s eyes. Read the other link saying Halsey is writing a book, let’s hope he’s man enough to expose the dirt.
Here it is Al, already written by the looks of it.
http://www.waterstones.com/waterstonesweb/products/mark+halsey/ian+ridley/the+referee/9527430/
Oh, cheers Stuart, didn’t realise it was available for pre-order. Hope its explosive, heard this book-writing stuff angered the pgmol & might have hastened his departure.
I just looked up the Halsey story – did not know he was retiring. Apparently he did not give the PGMOL their required 3 months notice, gave them only a day or two notice instead. He also did not let them know he was writing a book and that he is going to be the referee expert for BT Sport next season. That sounds like a bit of a breakup between Halsey and Riley, eh?
As a non-UK resident, could someone please explain the significance of BT Sport outbidding ESPN – Sky is still showing matches as well. What will change? I know ESPN has an almost universal hatred of Arsenal, so would BT Sport be a good thing to help viewers gain a more balanced viewpoint?
The ESPN ‘soccer’ pundits I mean, not ESPN as a corporation, hate Arsenal.
Sav,
While I’m no expert in the recent BT awarding of the selected games, I do know that with BT a subscription to the TV channel is not required provided you take out their internet package. The trouble with the ESPN offering was that not only did you have to take out Sky but you also then had to pay a further additional subscription for ESPN.
Thanks Stuart. That sounds like more people might have access to more matches. And if the referee expert on BT happens to not be kissing arse to Mike Riley anymore – if that is the case – maybe there will be a change in how the general public is sold on incorret referee decisions.