Arsenal News
Arsenal News & Transfers
As featured on NewsNow: Arsenal newsArsenal News 24/7

Arsenal News, Only Arsenal, Blogs, Transfer News

Archives

September 2017
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

What happened to the Grenfell Tower money collected from the Community Shield match?

By Tony Attwood

Let me admit from the off that in answer to that question, I don’t know.  But I think I ought to be able to find out.  And I ought to be able to find out when the families who suffered as a result of the Grenfell Tower fire got their money.  Not to check up on them, of course, but to keep an eye on the organisations that handled the fund raising.  Just in case.

And if the victims and their families haven’t had the money yet, to ask why not – because their need is now not in a year or two’s time.

Because I know Untold has many readers from outside the UK where the event of the Grenfell Tower fire may not have made the news, so let me explain very briefly.   On 14 June this year the 24 storey block of flats in North Kensington, London, caught fire causing at least 80 deaths and 70 injuries.  The final death toll is expected to be much higher.  Occupants of 23 of the 129 apartments are still unaccounted for.

The Football Association that runs the Community Shield match each season between the winners of the League and the winners of the FA Cup takes the game receipts and gives it to worthy causes.  This year Arsenal and Chelsea both nominated the Grenfell Tower fire fund.

In 2002, the Charity Commission, which in the UK oversees the proper accounting of money raised in the name of charities, found that the Football Association failed to meet its legal obligations under the Charities Act 1993, by failing to specify what money from ticket sales for the Charity Shield match (as it was then called) went to charity, and for delaying payments to the charities nominated.

As a result the FA were severely criticised by the Charity Commission, and the name “charity” was dropped from the competition title, making it the Community Shield as a way of getting around the regulations.

Looking around for information on the subject of this year’s Community Shield payouts the only FA website I could find that seemed relevant was “Who benefits from the cash raised by The FA Community Shield?” Unfortunately this does not seem to have been updated for nine years, although I may well have simply failed to find a more up to date page.   If you can find one, please write in, and we can write to the FA to tell them to get rid of or update the old page.

But in the meanwhile I am left with my questions such as

1: How much money did the FA collect in from the match?

2: How much of that will go to the victims of Grenfell?

3: How much has reached them so far?

4: When will any remaining money reach the victims and their relatives?

5: Given that the FA was forced to stop calling the match the Charity Shield because it did not abide by Charity Commission rules, who is overseeing the accountancy, and the distribution of money to ensure that the right amount is given and that money raised from the game is not used to pay FA debts?

6: Who is overseeing the issue to ensure that the money goes to victims and not to accountants and administrators, and god forbid, the local council?

7: If any money has not been distributed, why is this?  After all, everyone going to the game had to pay their money BEFORE the match.  If the money is sitting in an account, why?

Now these questions currently take on a sharper hue in that I was pondering them as the Eni Aluko “hush-money” case hit the news.   In this case the FA is under pressure to explain why it paid £80,000 to Eni Aluko after the player complained to the FA about a culture of bullying and harassment in the women’s game, and complained that England manager Mark Sampson made remarks with ‘racial connotations’.

An independent inquiry set up by the FA found no case for disciplinary action against Sampson.  But then the FA paid Aluko £80,000 seemingly with the proviso that she say nothing about the matter.

Of course the cases of the Grenfell Tower money and Aluko are not related, except that clearly the FA has money to hand out, in that it gave money to a player who made a complaint even though the complaint was found to be invalid.

The England manager against whom the racial slur allegation was made, disputed making the comment and a barrister was hired to investigate.  She exonerated the manager following her enquiry although at no time was the player interviewed either by the barrister or by the FA.

What’s more the FA not only paid out the £80k it also gave the player a central contract, worth another £20,000, “even though she had made it clear she would not play for England again while Sampson was in charge,” according to the Guardian’s report (a report that is hopefully more accurate than the one I was having a bash at yesterday).

Of course I have no inside information here, but the fact that the £80k was paid out in a case where it does not look necessary, suggests the FA has cash available.  Since it has all the money taken from the Community Shield game already in its coffers, it should have no difficulty in handing out the money to the people who are supporting the Grenfall survivors and the families of the victims.

But maybe there is a good reason.  In which case, why is the FA not able to say how much money will be handed over, and when it will be handed over, on a web site that is dead easy to find.

And indeed come to that why is there no prominent web page which details where the money has gone each year from the Community Shield match?

In many ways this is similar to my complaint against the ultra-secret PGMO.  If you have nothing to hide, why hide it?

Furthermore, when buying tickets for the Community Shield match, supporters were invited not only to buy the ticket but also make an extra donation for the victims of the fire and their families.  Again there is nothing around that I can find which tells us how much extra was raised in this way.

In effect this fund raising must surely come under the Charity Commissioners’ remit, and it would be good to know what they think of this rather weird state of affairs.

Of course all this information might well already be in the public domain and not for the first time I will be left looking like a total prat for not having found it.  Fair enough – but if it helps make the information more readily available that’s an indignity I think I can accept.

Recent Posts

From the Arsenal History Society

10 comments to What happened to the Grenfell Tower money collected from the Community Shield match?

  • Richard

    Well from a quick search the charities commission is involved in regulating and advising charities helpin Grenfell victims including British Red Cross and community shield. It was estimated the community shield would generate 1.25 million but no figure was given on what percentage of that would be forwarded to charities. In fact there is very little information on how much and if the victims have received a penny from the community shield money. I am currently searching on three devices through 15,600 hits so will take some time but this is just from my first five looks.

  • Richard

    Here you go tony this URL should help and actually this is quite an eye opener to look at total raised to what’s been sent to charities to what’s been given out big disparities.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/638669/grenfell_charitable_funds_report_august_2017.pdf

  • Steve Palmer

    Very good post, i must admit that after the event, when bodies are counted, you would expect charity money to be passed out. The public were made aware that the community shield money would be paid out to Grenfall victims.
    This story reminded me of a friend who had died, and left a sum of money to a charity he was fond of. The will took some time in concluding but the charity concerned had been informed of the gift and started to wonder when its gift would be paid out, but in the end they wrote to the solicitors and demanded that they wanted their money but they also wanted the interest that the sum would have made while in their account. It seems that life and death is an afterthought when money is concerned.

  • Rantetta

    Thanks for this article Tony.

    Thanks to Richard (above) too.

  • The_Ledge

    Maybe the FA can borrow the money from the cash rich DUP, and pay it back once they find the account where the CS money is being held 😉

  • Chris

    Richard,

    thanks for the link.
    Can’t see any mention of the FA…

  • Alex

    Hi Tony
    Good read must say.
    I know a thing or two about this tragedy cause as many out there my beloved friend lost his son and we talk.

    To generate money seems the easy bit i guess.

    Question is, still the number/identity beneficiaries are unknown not identified basically is what we hear.

    The amount of cash generated i dont think is difficult to know

    My understanding at the moment is there is to much politics than finding solution.

    Just ask this question :
    Out of the unaccounted bodies how many are identifiable ?

    How many completely believed incinerated or identifiable by DNA only ?

    So far the number released is the 70 mark.
    Everyone that survived that hell i spoke to including firefigthers that they been there told me many died on the stairs and by suffocation not incinerated so their body is intact but the number being around 150 to 200 is just to much that to reveal it in one go.

    By the look the wait is long i guess

  • para

    “but they also wanted the interest that the sum would have made while in their account.”

    This should be a stipulation made to any charity( i myself have a large mistrust of so called charities ), and i am glad that others seem to have a little mistrust too.

    There is a need for charities to be monitored closely. Good on you Tony.

  • Menace

    Tony, perhaps a quick communication with Mr. Corbyn with regard to the Oluko case requesting a public investigation into a public affair hidden by a private (possibly corrupt) group of ‘untouchables’.

  • Menace I am not sure that will work, but I am not leaving this one alone

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>