Just as I was thinking we’d had enough of hoaxes on this site for a while, a post turned up claiming that “Wenger is London’s least popular Premier League manager in the eyes of his club’s own supporters with Roy Hodgson, Guus Hiddink, Gianfranco Zola and Harry Redknapp all polling higher marks for last season”
The source of this great revelation was the mysterious Raoul Simons in the Evening Standard – mysterious in that if you click on the link to him on the Standard’s web site you go round in a circle and get back to his article – quite appropriate really given that the story was made up.
Roaul was something of a regular nutter for the Daily Mail in London until March this year coming up with such gems as
“Putin had to be Vlad all over to give Andrei’s Arsenal blessing” (an article which got a whole one comment)
“Sven misses ex-beau Ulrika’s triumph as his Mexican Swede dreams turn sour” (no comments)
and “Cheeky Leyton Orient reach for the stars with Red Devil Rooney their top target” (2 comments)
After that it all went quiet on the Raoul front. On 24 May when the Mail ran “Arsenal striker Arshavin demands huge pay rise … because taxman takes half his £80k a week” the story was by the anonymous “Sportsmail Reporter”. Raoul had gone missing, skulking into the darkness that opens up for everyone who has ever written for the Mail. (And yes I confess, 30 years ago I wrote a couple of chapters for a book the Mail published – but its out of print now and long forgotten, so lets forget it, or I’ll do your face in.) (As they say).
But back to our football man no longer at the Mail. You can’t keep a stinking load of fish underwater for long, and as the Sun and Mirror have joined with the Mail in issuing hoax stories about Arsenal so Raoul decided to move on and take his chance with the Evening Standard.
The story he has “written” relates to a supposed survey in which “at least” 100 supporters of each of the London EPL teams were asked about their manager’s performance in the past season.
So let’s be clear: this was a survey of 100 or so – a tiny number. But worse, there was no attempt to balance the survey.
If I may explain – when one does a survey one tries to get a representative sample. For example if you want to know about how people might vote in an election you look and see that 55% of the electorate are female, so you make sure your sample is the same. 12% are unemployed so your sample is the same. Only in this way can small numbers be validated as a representative sample.
Here, we had 100 people who claimed to be Arsenal supporters, who were asked about last season. They could rate Wenger between -5 and +5. The average was 2.1. So some people gave him -3 or whatever. No surprise there – we’ve seen these people at work on this site and others.
What we really need to know is how many of these people were workers at Lloyds of London. Again I must explain. A few days ago I reported that I had discovered that a large number of negative posts that we got about Arsenal and Wenger came from the same IP address. This does not mean they were all written on the same computer or by the same nutter – it could be a lot of people working in one huge organisation which channels all its emails out through this one IP address.
I also noted that a substantial number of the silly little anti-Wenger stories came from this same IP address, which, I have now discovered, is at Lloyds of London.
So, pulling it all together, if all these people who write anti-Arsenal stories are in fact three people working our of Lloyds of London, and these same people were over represented in this daft and stupid survey, there’s our answer. They gave Wenger -5 and that tells you what you need to know. Certainly the 60,000 who were at Arsenal v Stoke in May were not represented, as “one Arsene Wenger” rang out around the ground through the game and on into the farewell walk around.
As it happens, my office runs surveys quite regularly asking questions that are then used in commercial decision making (as in finding out how potential customers view certain products our clients are thinking of advertising through us), and I can tell you that we would never in 1000 years ask 100 people. It would be utterly unsafe to base anything on an unbalanced sample like that.
So, Raoul Simons is back in business. Probably frustrated that he wasn’t allowed in on the Arshavin tax hoax at the Mail, he’s now picked up his supermarket trolley and started dossing out dross in the SubStandard.
Which means we’ve now got four people doing Arsenal hoaxes – the Mirror’s John Cross (Bendtner “I must play every minute of every game”), the Mail (Arshavin demands new contract), the Sun’s Anthony Kastrinakis (Cesc off to Real Mad) and the Diddly Widdly Raoul “let me play, please” Simons, reporting on a hoax survey for the KGB owned Standard.
But at least it gives Untold Arsenal something to report in the Summer. Otherwise it would be “Darren Bent is on sale at £17m” which seemingly makes him worth more than Arshavin.
Oh you have to laugh, don’t you.
Acknowledgment: In much of the work of tracing our hoax emails back to Lloyds I was helped by Arsenal News – the utterly excellent news gathering site http://www.arsenalnews.co.uk/ which I 1000% recommend (it is on our side bar). I do hope you will have a moment to visit and use their site.
Footnote: leaving aside the excellent info from Arsenal News I have adopted the same rigorous checking procedures in this story as are to be found on the football pages of the Sun, the Mirror, the Mail and the Standard.
(c) Tony “Not At Lloyds & I have never written for the Sun” Attwood 2009. Copie of this article will shortly be posted under other names on Team Talk.
- Arsenal v the team that will present a giant toothbrush to our captain
- Arsenal squad for Europa League game
- The abuse of female footballers is appalling, but there is a wider context
- Why Arsenal v Glimt might be tougher than the game against Tottenham
- Is the team that passes the most, the team that gets the best results?