Arsenal v West Ham: What do the stats show that the referee likely to do?

 

By Bulldog Drummond

Craig Pawson has been confirmed as the referee.  He is at the high end for seeing fouls (22.73 per game compared to 19.13 for Peter Bankes, meaning Pawson sees 19% more fouls in a game than Bankes).  So Arsenal need to be careful.

In terms of penalties Pawson is near the low end compared with, for example, Anthony Taylor, the most used used referee in the League.    Taylor gives over twice as many penalities in league games as Pawson – and as the table below shows, Pawson is not the lowest penalty giver by any means.  Pawson also gives 28% more yellow cards out than Taylor.   But card-carrying and card-waving John Brooks beats them all on penalties.  He gives out 29% more penalties than Pawson, and an astonishing 66% more penalties than Taylor.

Thus once again we can see that how the game goes does depend very much on which referee you have.  But the funny thing about Pawson is that although he is toward the high end for giving fouls and the top for giving out yellow cards he is very near the bottom for handing out penalties.

One might even think from such figures that there is something not quite right about refereeing, but of course I am sure PGMO know best.

Referee Games Fouls pg Pen pg Yel pg
1.Anthony Taylor 22 21.50 0.41 3.27
6.Peter Bankes 16 19.13 0.31 3.88
8.Craig Pawson 15 22.73 0.20 4.20
11.Darren England 12 23.58 0.17 3.83
13.John Brooks 12 22.92 0.17 5.42
Variation top to bottom 23% 141% 66%

 

The variation row at the foot of the table shows what percentage more the referee giving out the most fouls, penalties and yellow cards, hands out, than the referee who is least inclined to give fouls, penalties or yellow cards.

We can see part of the lunacy of PGMO methods at work, and the pro-ref bias of the media to focus on any of this, from the simple fact that Pawson has overseen four Aston Villa matches this season, but none for Arsenal.   On its own, this statistic may seem not particularly significant, but if Pawson were to be suspected of any bias for or against a team then Villa could already be benefitting or harmed by this bias.

So we have been calling for years for each referee only to see each club a maximum of twice in the season.   Sadly no one has taken up what still seems to me to be a very reasonable request.   And the fact that this is not being discussed in any way, does add to my suspicion that there is something out there that is being hidden from view, although of course, I make no allegation against Pawson in this regard.

Now we have a look at some of the referees in the PGMO this season.

Pawson does not show up on any of the extremes thankfully, and he sees just under half of his games as home wins, which is roughly around the League average.

But just look at the lunatic range in those columns.  One referee only seea 11.8% home wins while another sees 80% home wins.  One sees no away wins, another sees 56.3% away wins.   One sees 6.3% draws and another sees 64.7% draws.

If this is how life normally worked there would be no science of statistics, because we would see everything as random. .

 

Referee Games HomeWin% AwayWin% Draw%
3.Chris Kavanagh 17 11.8 23.5 64.7
5.Peter Bankes 16 62.5 31.3 6.3
6.Samuel Barrott 16 37.5 56.3 6.3
7.Craig Pawson 15 46.7 26.7 26.7
11.John Brooks 12 75.0 16.7 8.3
13.Darren England 12 25.0 58.3 16.7
14.Darren Bond 10 80.0 0.0 20.0

 

And I will make the point once again that I have made before, that I am not suggesting all the referees should be seeing the same percentages.  But rather that this range is crazy, especially as we discovered through academic research after the pandemic just how much some referees (but not all) are affected by the crowd.

What appears to be happening is that some referees now have ignored the research and carry on regardless and are still being affected by the crowd, (although undoubtedly believing that they are not), while others have taken that research on board and moved the other way – sometimes to excess – working in favour of the away team!

But we can do nothing except recognise the referee that we have and note (although no one takes any notice of this) that he is a home referee, and with a spot of luck this should work in our favour,

So there we are: a referee who favours home teams, waves lots of cards and is not that keen on penalties.  And my usual point: we should not be able to distinguish referees in this way – and we wouldn’t if they were being shared around the clubs equally (not seeing one club four times and another not at all until this weekend) and all being trained to overcome the influence of the crowd while doing their jobs.

5 Replies to “Arsenal v West Ham: What do the stats show that the referee likely to do?”

  1. If I’ve got this right our Champions League draw looks like as follows, assuming we keep winning:

    R16

    PSV v Arsenal

    QF

    Arsenal V Real Madrid/Atletico Madrid

    SF

    Arsenal V PSG/Liverpool or Brugge/Aston Villa

    So our pathway to the final looks like being

    PSV

    Real Madrid

    PSG or Liverpool

    Piece of piss!!!!

    Forgive me if I’ve got it wrong.

  2. Now PSV want to change the date as it clashes with their Carnival. They tried to do exactly the same in 2007, we played them anyway during their Carnival. I remember lots of people wandering about dressed as carrots. No really! Bring it on!

  3. It does seem strange the way you discuss referees.

    I agree with you – their statistics should be far more random than they are.

    I have had a game this season where I make outdoors based on which referees are picked for which UCL games. For instance as soon as I saw what ref got Feyornord Bayern I predicted to my wife that Bayern would lose.

    By the way I watched Ajax USG play night – what a pigs ear Kavanagh made of the game. Most of the game was spent with players shaking their heads at decisions

  4. Les Williams

    “what a pigs ear Kavanagh made of the game. Most of the game was spent with players shaking their heads at decisions”

    Now that is odd, because I’m sure Howard Webb recently claimed our referees are the envy of Europe.

    Maybe he’s mistaken.

Leave a Reply